Reply With QuoteI will PM the answer if you want.Originally Posted by KingofOwls
I've been looking for you . . .
JPP Contributor
ok i am right... the pattern fits with every number. soooooo unless it's a total coincidence that the cipher works when you plug it in in every spot, i dont' know O_o
What you just read is a serious comment
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Need to contact me quickly?
Twitter: @JPPGrind (do this if you want near instant results)
I will PM the answer if you want.
I'm sick of following my dreams. I'm just going to ask them where they're going, and hook up with them later.
I've been looking for you . . .
JPP Contributor
sure
What you just read is a serious comment
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Need to contact me quickly?
Twitter: @JPPGrind (do this if you want near instant results)
I must be a genius because I have absolutely no idea.This took me about 4 minutes, I shall have to try this on some young children.
"May your reality be as pleasant as mine."
Althea (05-19-2012)
I've been looking for you . . .
JPP Contributor
dude seriously.... my erroneous solution works for EVERY number on there ..
how is that possible O_O
how are [x] correlated with such a cipher...
bizaree
What you just read is a serious comment
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Need to contact me quickly?
Twitter: @JPPGrind (do this if you want near instant results)
lol, you didn't say the answer was two, you ASKED if the answer was two......
Ok, its not a word problem, but this still fits.
math.jpg
I've been looking for you . . .
JPP Contributor
i said the number was two and provided my own logic that backed up my conclusion. did I just make up that logic out of thin air too?
What you just read is a serious comment
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Need to contact me quickly?
Twitter: @JPPGrind (do this if you want near instant results)
But could a preschool kid come up with the answer in that way?
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
Aoxomoxoa (05-20-2012)
what, then, was the question mark behind the sentence......to be honest, when I first read it and saw the = 3 in your "spoiler" I assumed you were arguing with me and Damo and claiming it was 3 instead of 2.....
does your solution explain 0000=4
Nicotine Deprived...
JPP Staff
No.
Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We do not act rightly because we have virtue or excellence, but rather we have those because we have acted rightly. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit.
- -- Aristotle
Believe nothing on the faith of traditions, even though they have been held in honor for many generations and in diverse places. Do not believe a thing because many people speak of it. Do not believe on the faith of the sages of the past. Do not believe what you yourself have imagined, persuading yourself that a God inspires you. Believe nothing on the sole authority of your masters and priests. After examination, believe what you yourself have tested and found to be reasonable, and conform your conduct thereto.
- -- The Buddha
I've been looking for you . . .
JPP Contributor
yes
What you just read is a serious comment
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Need to contact me quickly?
Twitter: @JPPGrind (do this if you want near instant results)
I've been looking for you . . .
JPP Contributor
0 = 1
1-5 = 0
6 = 1
7 = 0
8 = 2
9 = 1
works for every number.
where you guys think like preschoolers, I came up with an entirely different solution that works in every instance.
What you just read is a serious comment
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Need to contact me quickly?
Twitter: @JPPGrind (do this if you want near instant results)
I've been looking for you . . .
JPP Contributor
i basically skipped the circle counting and went straight to the cipher. So i was not wrong. Suck ittttt
What you just read is a serious comment
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Need to contact me quickly?
Twitter: @JPPGrind (do this if you want near instant results)
Posting Rules
Bookmarks