+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Steve McIntyre shows through FOI that Phil Jones is a liar

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    6,930
    Thanks
    1,100
    Thanked 470 Times in 369 Posts
    Groans
    483
    Groaned 131 Times in 118 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default Steve McIntyre shows through FOI that Phil Jones is a liar

    http://climateaudit.org/2012/05/06/y...n-flawed-data/

    Climate science by the team is an exercise in deception

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to tinfoil For This Post:

    Aoxomoxoa (05-08-2012)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    40,590
    Thanks
    892
    Thanked 3,716 Times in 2,883 Posts
    Groans
    125
    Groaned 339 Times in 311 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    CONSENSUS!!!!

    that is all
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    6,930
    Thanks
    1,100
    Thanked 470 Times in 369 Posts
    Groans
    483
    Groaned 131 Times in 118 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    too bad the CAGW (catastrophic anthropogenic global warming) crowd doesn't bother to read the links. SM explains very clearly how the climate team first perform an analysis of tree ring density using the entire sample of 400 trees, but later decide to use only 12 trees from the set.
    chron_siteadj2.jpg

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    40,590
    Thanks
    892
    Thanked 3,716 Times in 2,883 Posts
    Groans
    125
    Groaned 339 Times in 311 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    They refuse to read that which shows they have been lied to. They prefer shouting consensus and pretending the earth is flat.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    40,590
    Thanks
    892
    Thanked 3,716 Times in 2,883 Posts
    Groans
    125
    Groaned 339 Times in 311 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    side note... just in case you missed the latest in fear mongering from Hansen...

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/10/op...e-climate.html
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. McIntyre coauthors peer-reviewed refutation
    By tinfoil in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-07-2010, 10:44 PM
  2. Steve McNair...
    By Damocles in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-09-2009, 03:09 PM
  3. Liar, liar, pants on fire
    By TuTu Monroe in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-05-2009, 07:19 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-09-2006, 11:18 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts