This thread is strange. All his subsequent posts have been deleted, don't know if it was someone with magic buttons or the OP. Matters little because the content was the same stolen image in the OP, over and over again. So now we are left with a flood of my posts where once a tit for tat existed LOL.
Doesn't change the fact that the premise of the thread is a total fail . . .
The citizen's right to arms is among the "
great residuum" of powers
not granted to government through the Constitution.
So, the true situation is exactly opposite of what is supposed. The right to arms is not contingent on what the 2nd Amendment says.
The right to arms does not depend upon a particular definition of a word or a particular combination of words in the 2nd Amendment nor any particular interpretation of those words / clauses by a Court . . .
The right to arms of the citizen exists because
NO WORDS exist in the Constitution to grant the federal government a shred of power to even form a thought about the personal arms of the private citizen.
Bookmarks