Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 98

Thread: Jan Brewers son is an insane criminal

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default Jan Brewers son is an insane criminal

    http://www.azcentral.com/news/electi...l-records.html


    Ronald Brewer, 46, has dealt with mental illness since he was an adolescent. He was 25 years old when he was accused of sexual assault and kidnapping. He was found not guilty by reason of insanity in 1990 and committed to the Arizona State Hospital, where he has remained for most of the time since.

    Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/electi...#ixzz1lEJID6IR

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    He is in an institution.

    He raped some real life human being.

    She had his records sealed when she was about to become gov.

    She also is under investigation for how she dealth with SS to take care of his costs.

  3. The Following 2 Users Groan At evince For This Awful Post:

    Cancel 2018. 3 (02-02-2012), Rationalist (02-04-2012)

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to evince For This Post:

    Phantasmal (02-02-2012), Rune (02-04-2012)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    18,634
    Thanks
    17,467
    Thanked 5,105 Times in 3,823 Posts
    Groans
    19,214
    Groaned 3,543 Times in 3,270 Posts

    Default

    her actions are totally on the table, why someones retard son is attackable is kinda classless.

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    47,970
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 3,084 Times in 2,618 Posts
    Groans
    3,368
    Groaned 2,119 Times in 1,992 Posts

    Default

    funny how evince bitches when the right brings up the children of dem pols....but in her world, it is ok to attack the children of pub pols.

    and dude is right...why is this attackable? what relevance? so desperate to smear the woman, you have to go through her mentally ill kid.

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    funny how evince bitches when the right brings up the children of dem pols....but in her world, it is ok to attack the children of pub pols.

    and dude is right...why is this attackable? what relevance? so desperate to smear the woman, you have to go through her mentally ill kid.
    I noticed that she hasn't had anything negative to say about Obama's illegal relatives.
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    47,970
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 3,084 Times in 2,618 Posts
    Groans
    3,368
    Groaned 2,119 Times in 1,992 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    I noticed that she hasn't had anything negative to say about Obama's illegal relatives.
    apples/oranges.

  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,479
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    it's a criminal file, it should clearly be public access. it's also obvious political weaponry for both sides. shame on dems and repubs.
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  10. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,785
    Thanks
    7,190
    Thanked 12,921 Times in 7,750 Posts
    Groans
    102
    Groaned 808 Times in 757 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Actually this portion here about the politics, does make it relative for the voters of AZ, IMO. Also, I could give a shit about a rapist. Oh he's mentally ill? Yeah. Whatever. Cry me a river.

    Political connections

    The Arizona Republic obtained a copy of Ronald Brewer's court file in May through a records request.

    A week after Cooke asked the court to prevent The Republic from publishing anything from the case file, the governor's campaign lawyer, Lisa Hauser, signed on to help keep Ronald's case sealed.

    Hauser, who also provided legal counsel for Jan Brewer's transition team, is one of 13 applicants for a position on the Arizona Supreme Court - a position Brewer will appoint.

    The Commission on Appellate Court Appointments, which chooses the Supreme Court nominees, met in Phoenix on Monday. The commission moved Hauser ahead, granting her one of nine interviews to be held Sept. 30.

    Hauser did not return calls seeking comment.

    Doug Cole, who runs Brewer's campaign through the consulting firm High Ground and is one of the governor's closest advisers, has been intimately involved in the fight as well.

    About two weeks after Hauser signed on as counsel, Cole sat in on a meeting with Hauser, an attorney representing the state hospital, an attorney representing the newspaper and Lovely, to try to resolve the records dispute.

    Brewer also appointed Cole as one of 10 public members of the Commission on Appellate Court Appointments, which selects the judicial nominees.

    Paul Senseman, Brewer's spokesman, said Hauser came into the proceedings at the request of Ronald's attorney, who wanted Hauser's expertise in public-records law. Ronald paid for Hauser's services, Senseman said.

    Cole said he participated in the proceedings as a representative of the governor.

    "She's involved because she's the governor and he's her son. . . . This has nothing to do with the campaign," Cole said. "She needs to have her place at the table, and she entrusted me with that. Nothing more, nothing less."

    Lovely said: "Throughout this case, the governor's representatives tried to portray this solely as a family matter and not a political issue. Yet those representatives, Doug Cole and Lisa Hauser, are directly tied to the governor's re-election campaign."

    Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/electi...#ixzz1lEUYdr6e

  11. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,479
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darla View Post
    Oh he's mentally ill? Yeah. Whatever. Cry me a river.
    so your previous comments about helping people with mental illness were hypocritical lies?
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  12. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,785
    Thanks
    7,190
    Thanked 12,921 Times in 7,750 Posts
    Groans
    102
    Groaned 808 Times in 757 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterThanYou View Post
    so your previous comments about helping people with mental illness were hypocritical lies?
    Can you find my previous comments about helping people with mental illness? I would like to see one. Thanks.

  13. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,380
    Thanks
    101,876
    Thanked 54,750 Times in 33,621 Posts
    Groans
    3,151
    Groaned 5,065 Times in 4,683 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darla View Post
    Actually this portion here about the politics, does make it relative for the voters of AZ, IMO. Also, I could give a shit about a rapist. Oh he's mentally ill? Yeah. Whatever. Cry me a river.

    Political connections

    The Arizona Republic obtained a copy of Ronald Brewer's court file in May through a records request.

    A week after Cooke asked the court to prevent The Republic from publishing anything from the case file, the governor's campaign lawyer, Lisa Hauser, signed on to help keep Ronald's case sealed.

    Hauser, who also provided legal counsel for Jan Brewer's transition team, is one of 13 applicants for a position on the Arizona Supreme Court - a position Brewer will appoint.

    The Commission on Appellate Court Appointments, which chooses the Supreme Court nominees, met in Phoenix on Monday. The commission moved Hauser ahead, granting her one of nine interviews to be held Sept. 30.

    Hauser did not return calls seeking comment.

    Doug Cole, who runs Brewer's campaign through the consulting firm High Ground and is one of the governor's closest advisers, has been intimately involved in the fight as well.

    About two weeks after Hauser signed on as counsel, Cole sat in on a meeting with Hauser, an attorney representing the state hospital, an attorney representing the newspaper and Lovely, to try to resolve the records dispute.

    Brewer also appointed Cole as one of 10 public members of the Commission on Appellate Court Appointments, which selects the judicial nominees.

    Paul Senseman, Brewer's spokesman, said Hauser came into the proceedings at the request of Ronald's attorney, who wanted Hauser's expertise in public-records law. Ronald paid for Hauser's services, Senseman said.

    Cole said he participated in the proceedings as a representative of the governor.

    "She's involved because she's the governor and he's her son. . . . This has nothing to do with the campaign," Cole said. "She needs to have her place at the table, and she entrusted me with that. Nothing more, nothing less."

    Lovely said: "Throughout this case, the governor's representatives tried to portray this solely as a family matter and not a political issue. Yet those representatives, Doug Cole and Lisa Hauser, are directly tied to the governor's re-election campaign."

    Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/electi...#ixzz1lEUYdr6e
    I tell you, she abuses power.

  14. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,479
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rana View Post
    I tell you, she abuses power.
    do you know a politician who doesn't?
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  15. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    47,970
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 3,084 Times in 2,618 Posts
    Groans
    3,368
    Groaned 2,119 Times in 1,992 Posts

    Default

    another evince lie: "she had his records sealed"

    the truth:

    But Jan Brewer's ascendance to governor, after Janet Napolitano took a position in the Obama administration, triggered Ronald to request a change.

    His attorney filed a motion on Jan. 2, 2009, to seal the case file.

    "Ronald Brewer's mother is a public figure in the State of Arizona," the motion states. "It has come to our attention that others have recently attempted to embarrass Ronald Brewer and his family by publicizing his criminal and mental-health problems," it states.

    Gaines granted the motion on Jan. 6.



    Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/news/electi...#ixzz1lEYODJeE

    notice the judge, her son's doctor supported the motion. the matter was adjudicated properly in the end. this is a good example of why we have the best judicial system in the world. same judge, but two different decisions after weighing arguments from both sides.

  16. The Following User Groans At Cancel 2018. 3 For This Awful Post:

    Rune (02-04-2012)

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Cancel 2018. 3 For This Post:

    icedancer2theend (02-03-2012)

  18. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    12,386
    Thanks
    877
    Thanked 1,882 Times in 1,475 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 237 Times in 228 Posts

    Default

    (Excerpt) Reporter Ginger Rough, who covers the Governor's Office, in June asked the governor detailed questions about the case for a policy story about cuts to the mental-health budget. (End)

    Considering, as Governor, she has the power to cut the budget for mental health and, of course, considering her stand on ObamaCare the citizens of Arizona have every right to inquire. Would a poor person receive comparable treatment? What, exactly, are the costs for his treatment and who is paying? Would she be willing to have her son benefit from only the State supplied care? Is she paying for additional care? Would the sons/daughters of less wealthy mothers receive proper care? Does she give a damn about the less fortunate?

    There are numerous reasons full disclosure is in the interest of every Arizona citizen and it has everything to do with politics. That's evident by the timing of the request to seal the file after it had been open for 20 years.

    Gawd, those Republicans can be a deceitful bunch.
    "May your reality be as pleasant as mine."

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to apple0154 For This Post:

    Rune (02-04-2012)

  20. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    26
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by apple0154 View Post
    (Excerpt) Reporter Ginger Rough, who covers the Governor's Office, in June asked the governor detailed questions about the case for a policy story about cuts to the mental-health budget. (End)

    Considering, as Governor, she has the power to cut the budget for mental health and, of course, considering her stand on ObamaCare the citizens of Arizona have every right to inquire. Would a poor person receive comparable treatment? What, exactly, are the costs for his treatment and who is paying? Would she be willing to have her son benefit from only the State supplied care? Is she paying for additional care? Would the sons/daughters of less wealthy mothers receive proper care? Does she give a damn about the less fortunate?

    There are numerous reasons full disclosure is in the interest of every Arizona citizen and it has everything to do with politics. That's evident by the timing of the request to seal the file after it had been open for 20 years.

    Gawd, those Republicans can be a deceitful bunch.
    When she got the governorship and started denying health care to others, while making sure her son had his, she becomes the target of anything. Even her own undoing in this case.

  21. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JD Kramer For This Post:

    apple0154 (02-04-2012), poet (02-03-2012), Rune (02-04-2012)

Similar Threads

  1. Cain goes insane
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-06-2011, 12:48 PM
  2. Are you people insane? From the UK
    By TuTu Monroe in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-09-2009, 10:33 AM
  3. Rep Bachman is insane
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 03-24-2009, 06:35 PM
  4. Further example(s) of Democrats going insane?
    By Little-Acorn in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-24-2008, 06:23 AM
  5. You guys are insane
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-15-2007, 08:49 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •