I made a statement about the problems facing No Kill shelters. Your response was that I should shoot some of the rescued animals. You brought up my statement about hunting to prevent starvation. And you asked when I was going to do what I usually do and kill. So you brought up elements from our conversation about hunting.
And now you want to pretend you didn't?
Back to the OP.
While it is sad that these animals have to be put down, with limited resources it is a given that at least some will have to be euthanized. There are too many irresponsible pet owners and not enough resources to take care of all the strays.
So explain this:
Since you couldn't show I had an "anti-hunting conversation", you proceeded to pretend that you know I mean something I haven't said....LOL.
Your reading and comprehension issues aren't my problem, are they?
LOL, now you want to change the subject and discuss the issue? How convenient.
You are trying to say I have backed away from my original statement? Hardly accurate, now is it? In the thread I mentioned you were obviously anti-hunting. That you never stated that in so many words does not change this in the least.
But, like most topics you post on, you adamantly refuse to make an actual stand on one side or the other. That way you can continue to play these foolish games.
And yes, I thought I would bring us back to the original OP, since you obviously only want to play in circles and continue your "is that what I said?" nonsense.
Bookmarks