+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 145

Thread: End Of DADT Means More Gay Rape In The Military

Hybrid View

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    11,557
    Thanks
    2,665
    Thanked 1,141 Times in 1,028 Posts
    Groans
    1,111
    Groaned 474 Times in 419 Posts

    Default End Of DADT Means More Gay Rape In The Military

    "We are today releasing an analysis of publicly available documents which show that homosexuals in the military are three times more likely to commit sexual assaults than heterosexuals are relative to their numbers," Sprigg said. "We believe this problem would only increase if the current law against homosexuality...were to be repealed."

    Sprigg said his "analysis" was military documents tracking sexual assault cases. According to his figures, 8.2% of sexual assaults reported to military authorities in fiscal 2009 were homosexual in nature.

    "Yet homosexual activists themselves have admitted that less than 3% of Americans -- 2.8% of men and 1.4% of women -- are homosexual or bi-sexual," Sprigg explained.

    "Taken together," he continued, "these figures suggest that homosexuals in the military are about 3x as likely to commit sexual assaults as heterosexuals are."

    And the "most common type of homosexual assault" according to Sprigg? "one in which the offender fondles or performs oral sex on a sleeping victim," he said.

    Ipso facto:

    "If open homosexuality was permitted in the military, these numbers can only increase," Sprigg said. "The number of homosexuals would grow, the threat of discharge for homosexual behavior would be eliminated and protected class status for homosexuals would make victims hesitant to report assaults and make commanders hesitant to punish them for fear of appearing homophobic."

    The end result is obvious, according to the men on the call today: recruitment will be tougher and retaining straight servicemembers will be harder too.

    On the call, I asked Sprigg to elaborate -- was he really saying that non-consensual same-sex assaults would go unreported if Don't Ask, Don't Tell was repealed?

    "In a number of these cases the victim was sleeping or intoxicated," he replied. "Under those circumstances, their memory may be clouded and so the evidence may not be strong enough to stand up in a court-martial and actually prove guilt on a charge of forcible sodomy for example. Nevertheless, something inappropriate may have happened...and the victim will think twice about coming forth."
    .\http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2...e-military.php
    Last edited by DamnYankee; 08-16-2010 at 06:44 AM. Reason: link inserted

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    30,381
    Thanks
    4,195
    Thanked 4,840 Times in 3,496 Posts
    Groans
    78
    Groaned 475 Times in 454 Posts

    Default

    Hmmmm if I remember correctly from my rat psychology classes that an irrational fear of being butt fucked was a diagnostic sign of latent homosexuality. Just saying.
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

    http://www.justplainpolitics.com/pic...&pictureid=305

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    24,132
    Thanks
    1,124
    Thanked 1,601 Times in 1,381 Posts
    Groans
    4,730
    Groaned 687 Times in 662 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Damn Yankee View Post
    "We are today releasing an analysis of publicly available documents which show that homosexuals in the military are three times more likely to commit sexual assaults than heterosexuals are relative to their numbers," Sprigg said. "We believe this problem would only increase if the current law against homosexuality...were to be repealed."

    Sprigg said his "analysis" was military documents tracking sexual assault cases. According to his figures, 8.2% of sexual assaults reported to military authorities in fiscal 2009 were homosexual in nature.

    "Yet homosexual activists themselves have admitted that less than 3% of Americans -- 2.8% of men and 1.4% of women -- are homosexual or bi-sexual," Sprigg explained.

    "Taken together," he continued, "these figures suggest that homosexuals in the military are about 3x as likely to commit sexual assaults as heterosexuals are."

    And the "most common type of homosexual assault" according to Sprigg? "one in which the offender fondles or performs oral sex on a sleeping victim," he said.

    Ipso facto:

    "If open homosexuality was permitted in the military, these numbers can only increase," Sprigg said. "The number of homosexuals would grow, the threat of discharge for homosexual behavior would be eliminated and protected class status for homosexuals would make victims hesitant to report assaults and make commanders hesitant to punish them for fear of appearing homophobic."

    The end result is obvious, according to the men on the call today: recruitment will be tougher and retaining straight servicemembers will be harder too.

    On the call, I asked Sprigg to elaborate -- was he really saying that non-consensual same-sex assaults would go unreported if Don't Ask, Don't Tell was repealed?

    "In a number of these cases the victim was sleeping or intoxicated," he replied. "Under those circumstances, their memory may be clouded and so the evidence may not be strong enough to stand up in a court-martial and actually prove guilt on a charge of forcible sodomy for example. Nevertheless, something inappropriate may have happened...and the victim will think twice about coming forth."
    So basically they think something may have happened; but they're not really sure something happened.
    And because they think something may have happened, it means that something really did happen.

    Was that pretty much the gist of why the article was formulated.

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    15,716
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Is there a reason you're obsessed with gay sex?

    "In a number of these cases the victim was sleeping or intoxicated," he replied. "Under those circumstances, their memory may be clouded and so the evidence may not be strong enough to stand up in a court-martial and actually prove guilt on a charge of forcible sodomy for example.
    This sounds suspiciously like it might have involved gay sex-curious conservatives who took a walk on the wild side, and then later complained that they were raped.


  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    11,557
    Thanks
    2,665
    Thanked 1,141 Times in 1,028 Posts
    Groans
    1,111
    Groaned 474 Times in 419 Posts

    Default

    Ad Hominem; purposely misunderstanding.

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    30,381
    Thanks
    4,195
    Thanked 4,840 Times in 3,496 Posts
    Groans
    78
    Groaned 475 Times in 454 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Is there a reason you're obsessed with gay sex?



    This sounds suspiciously like it might have involved gay sex-curious conservatives who took a walk on the wild side, and then later complained that they were raped.

    Maybe we should all pitch in and buy SM a butt plug he can use to prevent gay rape in case a gay soldier happens to be in his neighborhood and, shall we say, is in the mood?

    He should be able to sleep peacefully knowing his purity has been protected!
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

    http://www.justplainpolitics.com/pic...&pictureid=305

  7. #7 | Top
    WinterBorn Guest

    Default

    Peter Sprigg? The guy is a nutcase.

    "On Tuesday's episode of Hardball, Family Research Council spokesperson and board member Peter Sprigg said that he believes that Lawrence vs. Texas (the Supreme Court decision that struck down the sodomy laws) was "wrongly decided" and that "gay behavior" should be criminalized."

    from: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alvin-..._b_446854.html




    And yes, I am attacking the source. The man offered no actual research. He took estimated numbers and tried to extrapolate them into bigger numbers. Pure nonsense.

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    47,546
    Thanks
    4,424
    Thanked 2,895 Times in 2,471 Posts
    Groans
    3,291
    Groaned 2,068 Times in 1,945 Posts

    Default

    homosexuality is legal in civilian society...is there any correlating stats to an increase in homosexual rape in civilian society? to just ASSume there would be an increase is stupid, i see no correlation. those that rape people won't change whether the policy is open homosexuality or not.

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    30,381
    Thanks
    4,195
    Thanked 4,840 Times in 3,496 Posts
    Groans
    78
    Groaned 475 Times in 454 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    homosexuality is legal in civilian society...is there any correlating stats to an increase in homosexual rape in civilian society? to just ASSume there would be an increase is stupid, i see no correlation. those that rape people won't change whether the policy is open homosexuality or not.
    Agreed. SM also is making the mistake of considering rape a sexual act when it is in fact an act of violence that has nothing to do with gender.
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

    http://www.justplainpolitics.com/pic...&pictureid=305

  10. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    19,527
    Thanks
    1,407
    Thanked 4,888 Times in 3,010 Posts
    Groans
    177
    Groaned 398 Times in 362 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Is there a reason you're obsessed with gay sex?



    This sounds suspiciously like it might have involved gay sex-curious conservatives who took a walk on the wild side, and then later complained that they were raped.

    posted this before but it's relevant

    What you just read is a serious comment
    +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+

    Need to contact me quickly?

    Twitter: @JPPGrind (do this if you want near instant results)

  11. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    29,329
    Thanks
    5,310
    Thanked 3,392 Times in 2,639 Posts
    Groans
    346
    Groaned 285 Times in 273 Posts

  12. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    30,381
    Thanks
    4,195
    Thanked 4,840 Times in 3,496 Posts
    Groans
    78
    Groaned 475 Times in 454 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Threedee View Post
    SM, way to be a fucking retard.

    Mott, though I can't say I have a fear of being buttfucked, I find that lesson to be bullshit. If the theory comes from the psychodynamic school, then it 100% is, otherwise, it just sounds idiotic...
    3D, if I have to explain the joke to you, then it isn't funny which, in your case is a moot point, be that as it may, you need to work on this sense of humor thing dude!

    I'm saying I really don't give a rats ass about SM's sexual phobias.
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

    http://www.justplainpolitics.com/pic...&pictureid=305

  13. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    29,329
    Thanks
    5,310
    Thanked 3,392 Times in 2,639 Posts
    Groans
    346
    Groaned 285 Times in 273 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    3D, if I have to explain the joke to you, then it isn't funny which, in your case is a moot point, be that as it may, you need to work on this sense of humor thing dude!

    I'm saying I really don't give a rats ass about SM's sexual phobias.
    I just fucking hate pop-psychology with such fierce intensity, that I can't laugh at these jokes when the source material is a fucking joke.

    Carry on...

  14. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    47,546
    Thanks
    4,424
    Thanked 2,895 Times in 2,471 Posts
    Groans
    3,291
    Groaned 2,068 Times in 1,945 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Threedee View Post
    I just fucking hate pop-psychology with such fierce intensity, that I can't laugh at these jokes when the source material is a fucking joke.

    Carry on...
    i was a psych/ed major for two quarters in college...FUCK the psych part

    don't get me wrong, some of it is valuable, but much of the "modern" thinking is so flawed and based not on science or hard data but rather "feelings"...

    i admit to having to see a shrink in junior high because i was a rabble rouser, single mom, handicap brother blah blah....i went through 3 guys and i burned them bad, they didn't want to see me ever again...the fourth guy, he didn't say anything to me, then asked if i wanted to take a walk to get a soda...he sort of acted like a dad....

    stayed with him for a while and thanked him for letting me see things in a different way...hmmm...see the simpleness of that

  15. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    30,381
    Thanks
    4,195
    Thanked 4,840 Times in 3,496 Posts
    Groans
    78
    Groaned 475 Times in 454 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    i was a psych/ed major for two quarters in college...FUCK the psych part

    don't get me wrong, some of it is valuable, but much of the "modern" thinking is so flawed and based not on science or hard data but rather "feelings"...

    i admit to having to see a shrink in junior high because i was a rabble rouser, single mom, handicap brother blah blah....i went through 3 guys and i burned them bad, they didn't want to see me ever again...the fourth guy, he didn't say anything to me, then asked if i wanted to take a walk to get a soda...he sort of acted like a dad....

    stayed with him for a while and thanked him for letting me see things in a different way...hmmm...see the simpleness of that
    That's pretty bad Yurt. You drove 3 Shriks nuts? I wonder what the fuck that says about us here at JPP in that you dont' really bother us.
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

    http://www.justplainpolitics.com/pic...&pictureid=305

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Pass by any means necessary
    By TuTu Monroe in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-20-2009, 07:53 AM
  2. Does the End Justify the Means?
    By LadyT in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-27-2008, 12:05 PM
  3. WHAT HAPPENED, WHAT IT MEANS
    By Chapdog in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-05-2008, 03:34 PM
  4. What Fascism means to me
    By Brent in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 07-09-2007, 07:02 AM
  5. Military Rape
    By Cancel7 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-10-2007, 06:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts