KBR to Get No-Bid Army Work as U.S. Alleges Kickbacks
http://www.businessweek.com/news/201...-update1-.html
lmao...nice change obama, i'm sure dick cheney is proud
WATERMARK, GREATEST OF THE TRINITY, ON CHIK-FIL-A
www.gunsbeerfreedom.blogspot.com
www.gunsbeerfreedom.blogspot.com
they are no longer apart of halliburton...but this just cracks me up
when bush did this, the libs were fuming....now, i bet we hardly hear anything about this
LOL They divide a part of the company and make a new name. I guess that's change lib-tards can believe in.
Not sure what Obama has to do with this but for the sake of argument, let's say it was his decision. He listened to the Army and Gen. Odierno and went by their wishes. How many times have I heard people say Obama should listen to the generals in the field for issues that pertain to the field? If Obama put the kibosh on this, those same people would be criticizing him for overriding the generals. It's a no-win situation for him.
For the record, I'm totally against no-bid contracts.
"The Army didn’t put this work out for bids because U.S. commanders in Iraq advised against it, saying that enlisting a new company would be too disruptive as the U.S withdraws, Army program director Lee Thompson said in an interview before the Justice Department action was announced.
Odierno’s View
The view of General Ray Odierno, the U.S. military commander in Iraq, was crucial to the decision, Army Chief of Staff General George Casey told reporters today.
“Odierno said, ‘I’ve got three million pieces of equipment I’ve got to get out of Iraq, I’ve got 100 or so bases to close, I’ve got to move 80,000-plus people out of here and you want me to change horses in the middle of the stream?’” Casey recounted.
The U.S. force in Iraq is scheduled to shrink from 94,000 troops today to 50,000 by August, with a complete withdrawal by December 2011."
http://visionsfromthehorizon.blogspo...0m-no-bid.html
Onceler is the first democratic partisan. I doubt anyone is surprised.
Groan.
How history judges Bush will depend largely by how Iraq and Afghanistan end up... and no... he is not in the bottom five.... even now. Though he is close.
My guess is he will end up ahead of Carter before all is said and done.
Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia@@AMEPARAM@@/wiki/File:Question_book-new.svg" class="image"><img alt="Question book-new.svg" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/99/Question_book-new.svg/50px-Question_book-new.svg.png"@@AMEPARAM@@en/thumb/9/99/Question_book-new.svg/50px-Question_book-new.svg.png
Quote from Cypress:
"Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.
They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "
Quote from Cypress:
"Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.
They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "
Bookmarks