+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Obama gives no bid contract to kbr

Hybrid View

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    47,506
    Thanks
    4,414
    Thanked 2,889 Times in 2,468 Posts
    Groans
    3,290
    Groaned 2,063 Times in 1,940 Posts

    Default Obama gives no bid contract to kbr

    KBR to Get No-Bid Army Work as U.S. Alleges Kickbacks

    http://www.businessweek.com/news/201...-update1-.html

    lmao...nice change obama, i'm sure dick cheney is proud

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Detroit, AKA HEAVEN
    Posts
    21,455
    Thanks
    6,155
    Thanked 4,258 Times in 3,090 Posts
    Groans
    373
    Groaned 367 Times in 348 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    KBR to Get No-Bid Army Work as U.S. Alleges Kickbacks

    http://www.businessweek.com/news/201...-update1-.html

    lmao...nice change obama, i'm sure dick cheney is proud
    Good ole KBR.
    WATERMARK, GREATEST OF THE TRINITY, ON CHIK-FIL-A
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigmund Freud View Post
    The fields of mediocre chicken sandwiches shall be sowed with salt, so that nothing may ever grow there again.
    www.gunsbeerfreedom.blogspot.com

    www.gunsbeerfreedom.blogspot.com

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    47,506
    Thanks
    4,414
    Thanked 2,889 Times in 2,468 Posts
    Groans
    3,290
    Groaned 2,063 Times in 1,940 Posts

    Default

    they are no longer apart of halliburton...but this just cracks me up

    when bush did this, the libs were fuming....now, i bet we hardly hear anything about this

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    13,062
    Thanks
    3,109
    Thanked 1,216 Times in 1,095 Posts
    Groans
    1,150
    Groaned 633 Times in 573 Posts

    Default

    LOL They divide a part of the company and make a new name. I guess that's change lib-tards can believe in.

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    8,500
    Thanks
    711
    Thanked 520 Times in 401 Posts
    Groans
    51
    Groaned 46 Times in 43 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    they are no longer apart of halliburton...but this just cracks me up

    when bush did this, the libs were fuming....now, i bet we hardly hear anything about this
    That's 'cause only Obamanation can allow no-bid contracts. It doesn't matter that general's who were in command under Bush may have had similar reasoning...nope, Bush, to shrill libtards always= bad.

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    21,446
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 1,982 Times in 1,405 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 287 Times in 274 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ice Dancer View Post
    That's 'cause only Obamanation can allow no-bid contracts. It doesn't matter that general's who were in command under Bush may have had similar reasoning...nope, Bush, to shrill libtards always= bad.
    Bush was always bad. He'll go down as one of America's worst 5 Presidents.

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Groanville
    Posts
    131
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Groans
    753
    Groaned 31 Times in 25 Posts

    Default

    Onceler is the first democratic partisan. I doubt anyone is surprised.

    Groan.

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    41,079
    Thanks
    971
    Thanked 3,947 Times in 3,058 Posts
    Groans
    131
    Groaned 377 Times in 346 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Onceler View Post
    Bush was always bad. He'll go down as one of America's worst 5 Presidents.
    Also... if Obama ends up adding $6-7 trillion to the debt in his first four years, he will surpass Bush on the 'Presidents who suck' list... not to mention he will be a one termer like Carter.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    12,713
    Thanks
    6,750
    Thanked 4,035 Times in 2,967 Posts
    Groans
    791
    Groaned 584 Times in 529 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    KBR to Get No-Bid Army Work as U.S. Alleges Kickbacks

    http://www.businessweek.com/news/201...-update1-.html

    lmao...nice change obama, i'm sure dick cheney is proud
    Not sure what Obama has to do with this but for the sake of argument, let's say it was his decision. He listened to the Army and Gen. Odierno and went by their wishes. How many times have I heard people say Obama should listen to the generals in the field for issues that pertain to the field? If Obama put the kibosh on this, those same people would be criticizing him for overriding the generals. It's a no-win situation for him.

    For the record, I'm totally against no-bid contracts.

    "The Army didn’t put this work out for bids because U.S. commanders in Iraq advised against it, saying that enlisting a new company would be too disruptive as the U.S withdraws, Army program director Lee Thompson said in an interview before the Justice Department action was announced.

    Odierno’s View

    The view of General Ray Odierno, the U.S. military commander in Iraq, was crucial to the decision, Army Chief of Staff General George Casey told reporters today.

    “Odierno said, ‘I’ve got three million pieces of equipment I’ve got to get out of Iraq, I’ve got 100 or so bases to close, I’ve got to move 80,000-plus people out of here and you want me to change horses in the middle of the stream?’” Casey recounted.

    The U.S. force in Iraq is scheduled to shrink from 94,000 troops today to 50,000 by August, with a complete withdrawal by December 2011."


    http://visionsfromthehorizon.blogspo...0m-no-bid.html

  10. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    S California
    Posts
    3,941
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    Not sure what Obama has to do with this but for the sake of argument, let's say it was his decision. He listened to the Army and Gen. Odierno and went by their wishes. How many times have I heard people say Obama should listen to the generals in the field for issues that pertain to the field? If Obama put the kibosh on this, those same people would be criticizing him for overriding the generals. It's a no-win situation for him.

    For the record, I'm totally against no-bid contracts.

    "The Army didn’t put this work out for bids because U.S. commanders in Iraq advised against it, saying that enlisting a new company would be too disruptive as the U.S withdraws, Army program director Lee Thompson said in an interview before the Justice Department action was announced.

    Odierno’s View

    The view of General Ray Odierno, the U.S. military commander in Iraq, was crucial to the decision, Army Chief of Staff General George Casey told reporters today.

    “Odierno said, ‘I’ve got three million pieces of equipment I’ve got to get out of Iraq, I’ve got 100 or so bases to close, I’ve got to move 80,000-plus people out of here and you want me to change horses in the middle of the stream?’” Casey recounted.

    The U.S. force in Iraq is scheduled to shrink from 94,000 troops today to 50,000 by August, with a complete withdrawal by December 2011."


    http://visionsfromthehorizon.blogspo...0m-no-bid.html
    Just like you always told us, Bush is in charge. Now Obama is in charge. Deal with it.
    McCain to Obama. "If you don't like our bill, send troops to help us."

    Obama, himself attempted to filibuster Justice Alito, who now sits on the Supreme Court.

  11. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    12,713
    Thanks
    6,750
    Thanked 4,035 Times in 2,967 Posts
    Groans
    791
    Groaned 584 Times in 529 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TuTu Monroe View Post
    Just like you always told us, Bush is in charge. Now Obama is in charge. Deal with it.
    I already said I'm against no-bid contracts so what the heck are you talking about?

  12. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Las Cruces New Mexico
    Posts
    10,170
    Thanks
    172
    Thanked 1,025 Times in 570 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 15 Times in 14 Posts

    Default

    KBR originally got the contracts for two reasons. They are one of the few companies on the face of the earth with resourses that rival that of entire nations. I remember once, when I worked on barges, being on the industrial canal just outside of New Orleans passing the Brown and Root docks. They followed the canal for miles, they had every manner of watercraft known to inland and off shore marine work. They had machine shops that were easily 300 yards long that ran 24 hours a day making everything from wheel shafts for boats to small supply vessels that would bring crew members and supplies to all their off shore rigs. They were and still are one of the best equipped corporations on the planet. The other reason the ORIGINALLY got the no bid contracts was because of Cheney. BUT, had they been subject to bids, they would have STILL gotten the job.

  13. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    41,079
    Thanks
    971
    Thanked 3,947 Times in 3,058 Posts
    Groans
    131
    Groaned 377 Times in 346 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Socrtease View Post
    KBR originally got the contracts for two reasons. They are one of the few companies on the face of the earth with resourses that rival that of entire nations. I remember once, when I worked on barges, being on the industrial canal just outside of New Orleans passing the Brown and Root docks. They followed the canal for miles, they had every manner of watercraft known to inland and off shore marine work. They had machine shops that were easily 300 yards long that ran 24 hours a day making everything from wheel shafts for boats to small supply vessels that would bring crew members and supplies to all their off shore rigs. They were and still are one of the best equipped corporations on the planet. The other reason the ORIGINALLY got the no bid contracts was because of Cheney. BUT, had they been subject to bids, they would have STILL gotten the job.
    The same can be said (and WAS said) about Haliburton and their no bid contracts. Yet we heard how much endless crap about the no bid contracts they received all because of Cheney's connection?
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  14. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    21,446
    Thanks
    73
    Thanked 1,982 Times in 1,405 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 287 Times in 274 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    The same can be said (and WAS said) about Haliburton and their no bid contracts. Yet we heard how much endless crap about the no bid contracts they received all because of Cheney's connection?
    Because Cheney's a bad guy.

    Duh.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Sign the Social Contract
    By Panda Hugger in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-27-2009, 09:56 AM
  2. Finally, we have a contract on a house again!
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 06-08-2009, 04:56 PM
  3. let us abolish marriage as a contract with the state
    By Don Quixote in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 12-23-2008, 03:24 PM
  4. Indicted? get a Bush contract anyway
    By evince in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-08-2008, 06:05 PM
  5. navy too drop citgo contract ?
    By bob in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-28-2006, 01:07 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts