+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 35

Thread: Recent Polls and Studies of the Tea Bag Party yield surprising results

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    15,716
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Recent Polls and Studies of the Tea Bag Party yield surprising results

    A recent poll, and a university study reveals surprising empirical data about the Tea Bag Party: they are more likely to be “racially resentful”.

    Who could have predicted?

    Are Tea Bag Partiers Racist?

    A new study shows that the movement's supporters are more likely to be racially resentful.




    Tea BagParty supporters were more likely to believe that "the Obama administration favors blacks over whites" and that "too much has been made of the problems facing black people." The survey also showed that Tea Party sympathizers are whiter, older, wealthier, and more well-educated than the average American.
    Some Tea Bag Partiers blame the media for casting them as racists. "It really makes me mad," says Tom Fitzhugh, a Tea party activist in Tampa. He believes the administration is intent on taking away his guns, trampling on states' rights, and opening the borders with Canada and Mexico.

    He has serious doubts that Obama was born in the U.S. and suspects that the president is a closet Muslim. (There's no evidence to support any of these accusations.)

    But his anger has nothing to do with race, he says.
    "Fuck You Niggers!!!"
    – Tinfoil, JPP.com, Summer 2009.

    By Arian Campo-Flores * Newsweek Web Exclusive
    Apr 26, 2010

    Ever since the Tea Party phenomenon gathered steam last spring, it has been plagued by charges of racism. Placards at rallies have depicted President Barack Obama as a witch doctor, denounced his supposed plans for "white slavery," and likened Congress to a slave owner and the taxpayer to a "n----r." Opponents have seized on these examples as proof that Tea Partiers are angry white folks who can't abide having a black president. Supporters, on the other hand, claim that the hateful signs are the work of a small fringe and that they unfairly malign a movement that simply seeks to rein in big government. In the absence of empirical evidence to support either characterization, the debate has essentially deadlocked.

    Until now, that is. A new survey by the University of Washington Institute for the Study of Ethnicity, Race & Sexuality offers fresh insight into the racial attitudes of Tea Party sympathizers. "The data suggests that people who are Tea Party supporters have a higher probability"—25 percent, to be exact—"of being racially resentful than those who are not Tea Party supporters," says Christopher Parker, who directed the study. "The Tea Party is not just about politics and size of government. The data suggests it may also be about race."

    Surveyers asked respondents in California and a half dozen battleground states (like Michigan and Ohio) a series of questions that political scientists typically use to measure racial hostility. On each one, Tea Party backers expressed more resentment than the rest of the population, even when controlling for partisanship and ideology. When read the statement that "if blacks would only try harder, they could be just as well off as whites," 73 percent of the movement's supporters agreed, while only 33 percent of people who disapproved of the Tea Party agreed. Asked if blacks should work their way up "without special favors," as the Irish, Italians, and other groups did, 88 percent of supporters agreed, compared to 56 percent of opponents. The study revealed that Tea Party enthusiasts were also more likely to have negative opinions of Latinos and immigrants.

    These results are bolstered by a recent New York Times/CBS News surveyfinding that white Tea Party supporters were more likely to believe that "the Obama administration favors blacks over whites" and that "too much has been made of the problems facing black people." The survey also showed that Tea Party sympathizers are whiter, older, wealthier, and more well-educated than the average American. They're "just as likely to be employed, and more likely to describe their economic situation as very or fairly good," according to a summary of the poll.

    If Tea Party supporters are doing relatively fine, what are they so riled up about? These studies suggest that, at least in part, it's race. The country that the Tea Partiers grew up in is irrevocably changing. Last month, new demographic data showed that minority births are on the verge of outpacing white births. By 2050, Hispanics are expected to account for more than a quarter of the American population. The Tea Partiers "feel a loss … like their status has been diminished," says David Bositis of the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, which examines issues of race. "If you listen to [their] language, it's always about 'taking our country back.' But it's really not taking the country back as is. It's taking the country back"—as in time.
    Bositis finds the movement's arguments about reckless federal spending unpersuasive. Why, he asks, weren't they up in arms when President George W. Bush launched two costly wars and created a new unfunded mandate with his Medicare prescription-drug plan? Why didn't they take to the streets when he converted a surplus into a massive deficit? "I don't like to be in a position where I'm characterizing people as being racially biased," says Bositis. "But when the shoe fits, what do you do?" Given modern societal norms, "they know they can't use any overtly racist language," he contends. "So they use coded language"—questioning the patriotism of the president or complaining about "socialist" schemes to redistribute wealth.

    The Tea Partiers bridle at such accusations. "That is so pathetic," says Danita Kilcullen, the founder of Tea Party Fort Lauderdale. "Nobody in the Tea Party movement that I know is a racist." She notes that she attends a church with a black pastor, supports a black candidate (Allen West) in a local congressional race, and backs a Latino candidate (Marco Rubio) for U.S. Senate. When a protestor showed up at one of her group's rallies with a racist sign, she says, she personally kicked him off the corner. "We absolutely don't tolerate anything like that," says Kilcullen. "Nobody uses the N word. Nobody calls Mexicans all those ugly things that people say. Those are lies about us." She concedes that the movement doesn't draw many African-Americans. "But that's because all the black people voted for Obama," she says. "Well, not all—but 90 percent." (It was actually 95 percent.)

    Some Tea Partiers blame the media for casting them as racists. "It really makes me mad," says Tom Fitzhugh, a Tea party activist in Tampa. "They have tried to portray us as a bunch of radical extremists." He considers Obama an abomination—possibly "the most radical-voting senator that ever was" and someone likely to "take us down the path of destruction." He believes the administration is intent on taking away his guns, trampling on states' rights, and opening the borders with Canada and Mexico. He has serious doubts that Obama was born in the U.S. and suspects that the president is a closet Muslim. (There's no evidence to support any of these accusations.) But his anger has nothing to do with race, he says. The real issue is that Obama is "taking down the Constitution and the way it's governed us for [hundreds of] years." All he wants, in other words, is to take his country back.

    http://www.newsweek.com/id/236996

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    44,195
    Thanks
    2,448
    Thanked 2,415 Times in 1,669 Posts
    Groans
    817
    Groaned 204 Times in 190 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    "Fuck You Niggers!!!"
    – Tinfoil, JPP.com, Summer 2009.
    Epic.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    44,195
    Thanks
    2,448
    Thanked 2,415 Times in 1,669 Posts
    Groans
    817
    Groaned 204 Times in 190 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Placards at rallies have depicted President Barack Obama as a witch doctor, denounced his supposed plans for "white slavery," and likened Congress to a slave owner and the taxpayer to a "n----r." Opponents have seized on these examples as proof that Tea Partiers are angry white folks who can't abide having a black president.
    I don't see the problem here.

    /damo

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    40,712
    Thanks
    908
    Thanked 3,759 Times in 2,921 Posts
    Groans
    126
    Groaned 347 Times in 317 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    A recent poll, and a university study reveals surprising empirical data about the Tea Bag Party: they are more likely to be “racially resentful”.

    Who could have predicted?
    Sorry, but when the ENTIRE data set of the UW study was released, it showed that the tea party was not that different from other white groups.

    In fact, White LIBERALS were shown to think blacks were untrustworthy by a wider margin than the Tea Party members.

    It took real stupidity to point to yet another article that tried to cherry pick the UW study. Only you gumby... only you could have been that ignorant.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    40,712
    Thanks
    908
    Thanked 3,759 Times in 2,921 Posts
    Groans
    126
    Groaned 347 Times in 317 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...st_105309.html

    amazing how the story changes when not dealing with cherry picked data, though we all know that is exactly what Cypress's masters do... and he falls for it every time.

    Thus, while only 35% of strong Tea Party supporters rated blacks as hardworking, only 49% described whites as such. While the gap is evident, these responses are close to those for all whites (blacks are rated as "hardworking" by 40%, whites by 52%). While whites who are strongly anti-Tea Party seem free of bias on this item -- blacks and whites are rated as "hardworking" by 55% and 56%, respectively - this is not true for intelligence and trustworthiness. Whites in every group are less likely to rate blacks than whites as "intelligent" by similar margins: 14 points for Tea Party supporters (45% vs. 59%), 13 points for all whites (49% vs. 62%), 10 points for Tea Party opponents (59% vs. 69%). On "trustworthy," the gap is smaller in the pro-Tea Party group (41% vs. 49%) than in the anti-Tea Party group (57% vs. 72%). One could write headlines about the "racial paranoia" of white liberals who consider blacks less trustworthy than whites!
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    47,546
    Thanks
    4,424
    Thanked 2,895 Times in 2,471 Posts
    Groans
    3,291
    Groaned 2,068 Times in 1,945 Posts

    Default

    without knowing all the questions and who the sample groups were, it is difficult to know whether the results are worth a warm bucket of spit.

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Detroit, AKA HEAVEN
    Posts
    20,955
    Thanks
    5,754
    Thanked 4,030 Times in 2,923 Posts
    Groans
    345
    Groaned 230 Times in 216 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...st_105309.html

    amazing how the story changes when not dealing with cherry picked data, though we all know that is exactly what Cypress's masters do... and he falls for it every time.
    Clearly that study was done by racist kkk GEDers.

    /Topspin.
    WATERMARK, GREATEST OF THE TRINITY, ON CHIK-FIL-A
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigmund Freud View Post
    The fields of mediocre chicken sandwiches shall be sowed with salt, so that nothing may ever grow there again.
    www.gunsbeerfreedom.blogspot.com

    www.gunsbeerfreedom.blogspot.com

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    44,195
    Thanks
    2,448
    Thanked 2,415 Times in 1,669 Posts
    Groans
    817
    Groaned 204 Times in 190 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    aight
    "Women hold up half the sky." - Mao Zedong

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Convington, La
    Posts
    22,052
    Thanks
    1,284
    Thanked 277 Times in 234 Posts
    Groans
    524
    Groaned 177 Times in 171 Posts

    Default

    tea party morons thought balcks were less hard working then whites did by a wide margin.
    Duh!!!
    I got somthin makes me want to shout, I got soul "I'm super bad"

  10. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    18,923
    Thanks
    364
    Thanked 1,414 Times in 1,198 Posts
    Groans
    285
    Groaned 489 Times in 471 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Topspin View Post
    tea party morons thought balcks were less hard working then whites did by a wide margin.
    Duh!!!
    amazing example of cherry picking.....is THAT really what you discovered while reading SF's article?.......

  11. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    40,712
    Thanks
    908
    Thanked 3,759 Times in 2,921 Posts
    Groans
    126
    Groaned 347 Times in 317 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I imagine Cypress will be back sometime today to justify his idiocy in some manner.

    toppy.... way to cherry pick once again....
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  12. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Convington, La
    Posts
    22,052
    Thanks
    1,284
    Thanked 277 Times in 234 Posts
    Groans
    524
    Groaned 177 Times in 171 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    I imagine Cypress will be back sometime today to justify his idiocy in some manner.

    toppy.... way to cherry pick once again....
    cherry pick lol it's one of the first lines in the piece you cut and paste front and center. Take off your pointy hat
    I got somthin makes me want to shout, I got soul "I'm super bad"

  13. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    6,953
    Thanks
    1,147
    Thanked 481 Times in 376 Posts
    Groans
    542
    Groaned 143 Times in 127 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    lol flawed study is fucking flawed.

    The questions are ridiculous.
    Go read them. Race baiting scum

  14. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Convington, La
    Posts
    22,052
    Thanks
    1,284
    Thanked 277 Times in 234 Posts
    Groans
    524
    Groaned 177 Times in 171 Posts

    Default

    cracker ass cracker
    I got somthin makes me want to shout, I got soul "I'm super bad"

  15. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    6,953
    Thanks
    1,147
    Thanked 481 Times in 376 Posts
    Groans
    542
    Groaned 143 Times in 127 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    LOL call me whatever you want.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Michael Steele studies latest pole?!!!
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-04-2010, 09:00 PM
  2. Americans are a stupid people - Statistics, Studies and Research
    By blackascoal in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 234
    Last Post: 08-21-2009, 01:15 PM
  3. Kinda Surprising
    By Cancel7 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 12-30-2008, 06:48 PM
  4. A look at the recent Presidential polls
    By WRL in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 03-25-2008, 04:32 PM
  5. Surprising Poll Findings?
    By TheDanold in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 11-05-2007, 04:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts