Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 135

Thread: Why do people often vote against their own interests?

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,320
    Thanks
    7,144
    Thanked 8,821 Times in 6,166 Posts
    Groans
    5,805
    Groaned 1,532 Times in 1,444 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    We shouldn't waste time with democracy. Republicans are too dangerous to risk millions of ignorant fools putting them into power.
    "Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34

  2. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,320
    Thanks
    7,144
    Thanked 8,821 Times in 6,166 Posts
    Groans
    5,805
    Groaned 1,532 Times in 1,444 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    at what cost......cradle to grave socialism has turned Europe into a non-entity....
    The death of imperialism shrunk Europes relative economic status. By any measure they're obviously well off, and economically growing faster than America, they just don't breed like rats. Europe will one day exceed America as conservativism slowly disintegrates what's left of us. We will be a tributary to China in 50 years at this pace.
    "Do not think that I came to bring peace... I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." - Matthew 10:34

  3. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,833
    Thanks
    13,240
    Thanked 40,780 Times in 32,146 Posts
    Groans
    3,660
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Atheistmark View Post
    Europe will one day exceed America as conservativism slowly disintegrates what's left of us.
    if we aspire to follow their example, no doubt they will....but it isn't conservatives that aspire to follow their example, is it?.....
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  4. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    3,296
    Thanks
    590
    Thanked 1,229 Times in 809 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 176 Times in 163 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Good Luck View Post
    To answer the original question the most common reason is because there are those who believe their interests are better met through means different than what others believe. It is nothing less than massive egocentric arrogance to think otherwise. And the arrogance of the left is absolute on this topic. No one will give even a nanometer on their absolute religious-like faith (yes, your bullshit goes way beyond simple belief) that anyone who disagrees with their conclusion can only do so out of ignorance.
    "Believe" is the operative word.

    Reasonable but wrong. The majority of Americans were and probably still are in favor of healthcare reform and a majority are still for a single payer type system. That we rank 37th cannot make too many Americans happy. But majorities don't always win even in our democracy. Power wins too often because it can change the dialogue and make the good seem bad. Any idea that incurs costs is in trouble in America today because costs can be used to defeat the best interests of all the people.

    Having traveled in Europe and a great deal in Canada, Americans have a kind of myopic view of the world. Our bad is better than their good. Weird because you'll notice not a single one of these nations have politicians running on a rollback of the social safety net. Same here when it comes to Social security, Medicare, or even emergency room care.

    The luxury argument is a bit off base. Give a real life example, insured people are quickly removed after they have exhausted their coverage. But Medicare folks are treated wonderfully, because, well you can guess can't you: GOVERNMENT - 'socialism' to those who fail to consider society doesn't exist simply for the rich to exploit.

    And the argument that something better is just around the corner is laughable. Consider this has gone on since Teddy Roosevelt....Yea, sure! Change gonna come, you just sit tight....

    I think the premise holds, people do vote against the interests of all and in doing so against their own interests, but there is the twist because once you have something you like, fear of loss overcomes reasonable consideration. Add cost or add the real bogeyman to that, taxes, and all is lost, greed wasn't made a cardinal sin for nuttin.


    http://www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html
    http://www.kff.org/insurance/snapshot/chcm010307oth.cfm

  5. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    12,386
    Thanks
    877
    Thanked 1,882 Times in 1,475 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 237 Times in 228 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Good Luck View Post
    To answer the original question the most common reason is because there are those who believe their interests are better met through means different than what others believe. It is nothing less than massive egocentric arrogance to think otherwise. And the arrogance of the left is absolute on this topic. No one will give even a nanometer on their absolute religious-like faith (yes, your bullshit goes way beyond simple belief) that anyone who disagrees with their conclusion can only do so out of ignorance.

    The left keeps harping about the need of the right to "join the 21st century". Yet what they support was invented over 80 years ago. So whose heads are truly in the past?

    The health systems of Europe, Canada and elsewhere cannot be described as failures. However, neither can they be genuinely called great successes either. We keep heaqring how European systems spend a little more than half per capita what America spends. What they try to hide is the fact that America was spending slightly more than twice as much per capita on health care BEFORE Europe and others went the way of universal care. So universal care does not, in reality, reduce costs on a per-capita basis.

    So what DOES cost twice as much? To answer that, we look to quality of care. Yes, most universal systems meet the BASICS of care reasonably adequately, though the (undoubtedly exaggerated) stories of waiting lines and rationed care have a minimal basis of fact to them. But quality of care includes more than whether a hospital has enough acetaminophen, gauze rolls and xray films on hand to meet needs. Quality includes what some on here have decried as "unnecessary luxuries" like private rooms, or comfortable visitor chairs, which, if a universal plan cannot sustain, can be done away with.

    But, we Americans like our luxuries, and we always will. Not only that, but there are many (including myself, having spent innumerable hours in hospitals watching over friends and family) who strongly disagree with the claims that things like private rooms, comfortable visitor chairs, cable television, etc. are not a part of quality of health care.

    If universal plans cannot sustain the type of care we have in the U.S., if one price of universal care is to get rid of "luxuries", then IMO, we need to start looking for a different answer than the one others came up with a long, long time ago. IMO, the better answers to addressing health care problems in our society will (or should) come from ORIGINAL thinking, not copy-cat thinking.
    The problem is opponents argue both sides of the argument. First it's the "costs will soar" argument. When it's shown countries with universal plans have lower costs the argument turns to "good health care". When it's shown life expectancy is on par the argument switches to "quality" or "luxury".

    Let's do the math. Countries with universal health care perform equal to or better than the "pay or suffer" system when talking about the most important aspect of health care; preventing death or longer life expectancy. That is accomplished at half the price. The figures are readily available on the net. That part of the discussion is settled.

    Then we move to waiting lists and luxuries. If countries with universal plans spent the equivalent of what the US spends, in other words doubled their budgets, can we even imagine the results regarding waiting times and luxuries? Twice as many of everything; doctors, nurses, hospitals, equipment, drugs, TVs.....yes, even chairs.

    Implementing a universal plan is not copy-cat thinking. Universal plans are as varied as homes; from those on wheels to million dollar houses. While they're both "homes" they certainly are not copy-cats.

    In France, doctors make house calls. If one waited for a doctor to make a house call in Canada it would be a long wait indeed.

    The bottom line is the people decide what level of medical care they want. More luxuries equal higher taxes. Most countries have settled on a balance that covers everyone at 1/2 the US cost. If a comfortable chair is important because it encourages visitors which, in turn, speeds recovery of a patient resulting in lower costs then universal plans will supply comfortable chairs.
    "May your reality be as pleasant as mine."

  6. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,470
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 125 Times in 84 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 33 Times in 24 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by midcan5 View Post
    "Believe" is the operative word.

    Reasonable but wrong. The majority of Americans were and probably still are in favor of healthcare reform and a majority are still for a single payer type system. That we rank 37th cannot make too many Americans happy. But majorities don't always win even in our democracy. Power wins too often because it can change the dialogue and make the good seem bad. Any idea that incurs costs is in trouble in America today because costs can be used to defeat the best interests of all the people.

    Having traveled in Europe and a great deal in Canada, Americans have a kind of myopic view of the world. Our bad is better than their good. Weird because you'll notice not a single one of these nations have politicians running on a rollback of the social safety net. Same here when it comes to Social security, Medicare, or even emergency room care.

    The luxury argument is a bit off base. Give a real life example, insured people are quickly removed after they have exhausted their coverage. But Medicare folks are treated wonderfully, because, well you can guess can't you: GOVERNMENT - 'socialism' to those who fail to consider society doesn't exist simply for the rich to exploit.

    And the argument that something better is just around the corner is laughable. Consider this has gone on since Teddy Roosevelt....Yea, sure! Change gonna come, you just sit tight....

    I think the premise holds, people do vote against the interests of all and in doing so against their own interests, but there is the twist because once you have something you like, fear of loss overcomes reasonable consideration. Add cost or add the real bogeyman to that, taxes, and all is lost, greed wasn't made a cardinal sin for nuttin.


    http://www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html
    http://www.kff.org/insurance/snapshot/chcm010307oth.cfm
    1) in case you have not notices, while a majority want health care reform, the majority also do NOT want the kinds of reform you keep pushing. Why do you think it is so difficult to get it passed? Even when democrats have a supr majority in the senate, you cannot get what you want passed, due to "blue dog" democrats actually (gasp!) listening to their constituency. If they thought the MAJORITY wanted it, they'd have no trouble with passing it and getting re-elected, would they? It is actually very simple: if your claims were true about what the majority of people want, the kind of health care reform pushed by liberals would have passed a long time ago.

    2) Ditto your claims about single-payer system. There is a vocal minority, but NOT, by a long fucking stretch, a MAJORITY as you are lying about. IF it were a majority, politicians would not be so afraid to vote for it, would they? So stop lying about these "majority want this" and Majority want that" bullshit. It's a lie, and anyone whose head is not firmly implanted in the donkey's ass knows it's a lie, INCLUDING many politicians in your own fucking party.

    3) Yes, "beleive" is the operative word. You BELIEVE copying other systems is the ONLY possible correct answer. Others BELIEVE that there is a better way. The difference is most others are not so arrrogant as to insist their belief is the ONe and ONLY truth - they reserve that level of belief for their religions. Liberals have made their political philosophy their religion. Again: most want reform, but most do NOT want the kinds of reform constantly pushed by liberal democrats. If most actually wanted it, blue dogs and even a few moderate republicans would be voting for it because they could do so and still get reelected.

    And to re-state the "belief" aspect, which is the real answer to your original question, people as a whole do NOT vote against their best interests. They may believe their best interests lie in a different direction or through different means that you promote, so they vote differently than you would have them vote. (too fucking bad for you, huh?) Saying that is "wrong" just shows the incredible narrow-minded arrogance your type exhibit on a daily basis.

    4) Have you looked at the factors that put the U.S. 37th? Three of them are specific to universal type plans, so anyone without a universal type plan will automatically rank very low. Note that the U.S. ranks 1st in responsiveness of health care system which one of the factors that we have pointed out before in problems created by centralized universal plans: government bureaucracies are notorious for slow reaction to new conditions, treatments, etc.

    5) Are you deliberately obtuse, have difficulty understanding ideas that are not DNC approved, plain assed stupid, or creating a strawman because you don't want to address the idea? I never said "right around the corner" or any other such claim. I DID say that IMO we can DO better by thinking outside the box and coming up with a solution that does NOT include copying what others are doing. Every other plans has problems of one type or another. EVERY plan is currently facing problems with the ability to adequately fund their plans. I do believe that, if we TRY (which you, with your "we alone know the truth!" attitudes do NOT want to try) we CAN come up with something better.

  7. #52 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    39,053
    Thanks
    3,463
    Thanked 1,324 Times in 1,188 Posts
    Groans
    1,184
    Groaned 693 Times in 631 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
    What are you....fucking stupid or stoned? As the the chronology of the posts on these threads show, I am NOT the one dancing with glee over Brown's election.

    I merely pointed out the sheer hypocrisy of a statement by your fellow parrot that you chimed in on. What I said about Brown is a documented, bonafide FACT. TFB for you if the truth isn't to your liking.
    And of course I simply pointed out your hypocrisy. LOL

  8. #53 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by midcan5 View Post
    "Believe" is the operative word.

    Reasonable but wrong. The majority of Americans were and probably still are in favor of healthcare reform and a majority are still for a single payer type system. That we rank 37th cannot make too many Americans happy. But majorities don't always win even in our democracy. Power wins too often because it can change the dialogue and make the good seem bad. Any idea that incurs costs is in trouble in America today because costs can be used to defeat the best interests of all the people.

    Having traveled in Europe and a great deal in Canada, Americans have a kind of myopic view of the world. Our bad is better than their good. Weird because you'll notice not a single one of these nations have politicians running on a rollback of the social safety net. Same here when it comes to Social security, Medicare, or even emergency room care.

    The luxury argument is a bit off base. Give a real life example, insured people are quickly removed after they have exhausted their coverage. But Medicare folks are treated wonderfully, because, well you can guess can't you: GOVERNMENT - 'socialism' to those who fail to consider society doesn't exist simply for the rich to exploit.

    And the argument that something better is just around the corner is laughable. Consider this has gone on since Teddy Roosevelt....Yea, sure! Change gonna come, you just sit tight....

    I think the premise holds, people do vote against the interests of all and in doing so against their own interests, but there is the twist because once you have something you like, fear of loss overcomes reasonable consideration. Add cost or add the real bogeyman to that, taxes, and all is lost, greed wasn't made a cardinal sin for nuttin.


    http://www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html
    http://www.kff.org/insurance/snapshot/chcm010307oth.cfm
    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...th_care_reform

    Health Care Reform
    Final Health Care Tracking Poll: 58% Oppose the Plan Before Congress
    Friday, January 22, 2010

    Why is it you can't grasp this simple fact.

    The public wants HC reform, just not in the form being pushed down our throats by the Democrats....
    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  9. #54 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    55,018
    Thanks
    15,249
    Thanked 19,001 Times in 13,040 Posts
    Groans
    307
    Groaned 1,147 Times in 1,092 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bravo View Post
    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...th_care_reform

    Health Care Reform
    Final Health Care Tracking Poll: 58% Oppose the Plan Before Congress
    Friday, January 22, 2010

    Why is it you can't grasp this simple fact.

    The public wants HC reform, just not in the form being pushed down our throats by the Democrats....
    Well no shit Captain Obvious. I all ready made that point about the middle being steam rolled by the extremes who feel HC reform either goes to far or not far enough.
    You're Never Alone With A Schizophrenic!

  10. #55 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    20,801
    Thanks
    5,108
    Thanked 5,629 Times in 4,083 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,357 Times in 1,282 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
    What are you....fucking stupid or stoned? As the the chronology of the posts on these threads show, I am NOT the one dancing with glee over Brown's election.

    I merely pointed out the sheer hypocrisy of a statement by your fellow parrot that you chimed in on. What I said about Brown is a documented, bonafide FACT. TFB for you if the truth isn't to your liking.
    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Man View Post
    And of course I simply pointed out your hypocrisy. LOL
    You just don't get it, do you chuckles? People who can READ and have a comprehension level of a high school graduate or better can check the chronology of the posts to see what a dishonest childish neocon buffoon you are. Hurling out or repeating another baseless accusation that the post do not logically support just makes you more pathetic.

    Grow a spine and deal with the FACTS...you and your fellow neocon parrots squawking with glee over Brown in Massachusetts is hypocrital at best....voting against your best interests at worst. But like the coward you are, you'll just ignore the facts and the logic derived from them, and repeat your lies and slander as a dodge....so much more to pity you.

    Carry on, as I'm done with you here.
    During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.

    George Orwell

  11. #56 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    85,117
    Thanks
    2,505
    Thanked 16,529 Times in 10,534 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 578 Times in 535 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Ugh... This is getting boring.
    Excellence is an art won by training and habituation. We do not act rightly because we have virtue or excellence, but rather we have those because we have acted rightly. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit.
    - -- Aristotle

    Believe nothing on the faith of traditions, even though they have been held in honor for many generations and in diverse places. Do not believe a thing because many people speak of it. Do not believe on the faith of the sages of the past. Do not believe what you yourself have imagined, persuading yourself that a God inspires you. Believe nothing on the sole authority of your masters and priests. After examination, believe what you yourself have tested and found to be reasonable, and conform your conduct thereto.
    - -- The Buddha

    It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
    - -- Aristotle

  12. #57 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mid-Atlantic State
    Posts
    26,917
    Thanks
    3,256
    Thanked 5,373 Times in 4,319 Posts
    Groans
    1,505
    Groaned 2,440 Times in 2,029 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Well no shit Captain Obvious. I all ready made that point about the middle being steam rolled by the extremes who feel HC reform either goes to far or not far enough.
    Really.....I missed it...what fuckin' post was that ?

    Just give me the #....bootlicker...

    58% Oppose the Plan Before Congress
    The public wants HC reform, just not in the form being pushed down our throats by the Democrats....
    Put blame where it belongs
    ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
    It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
    The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.


  13. #58 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    39,053
    Thanks
    3,463
    Thanked 1,324 Times in 1,188 Posts
    Groans
    1,184
    Groaned 693 Times in 631 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
    You just don't get it, do you chuckles? People who can READ and have a comprehension level of a high school graduate or better can check the chronology of the posts to see what a dishonest childish neocon buffoon you are. Hurling out or repeating another baseless accusation that the post do not logically support just makes you more pathetic.

    Grow a spine and deal with the FACTS...you and your fellow neocon parrots squawking with glee over Brown in Massachusetts is hypocrital at best....voting against your best interests at worst. But like the coward you are, you'll just ignore the facts and the logic derived from them, and repeat your lies and slander as a dodge....so much more to pity you.

    Carry on, as I'm done with you here.
    There we are, back to the OP. And again, we conservatives put forth the long-term interests of society over our own selfish, short-sighted desires; liberals do the opposite.

  14. #59 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Philly, PA
    Posts
    3,296
    Thanks
    590
    Thanked 1,229 Times in 809 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 176 Times in 163 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Good Luck View Post
    ....
    5) Are you deliberately obtuse, have difficulty understanding ideas that are not DNC approved, plain assed stupid, or creating a strawman because you don't want to address the idea? I never said "right around the corner" or any other such claim. I DID say that IMO we can DO better by thinking outside the box and coming up with a solution that does NOT include copying what others are doing. Every other plans has problems of one type or another. EVERY plan is currently facing problems with the ability to adequately fund their plans. I do believe that, if we TRY (which you, with your "we alone know the truth!" attitudes do NOT want to try) we CAN come up with something better.
    If we stand still as you propose Americans without healthcare will suffer, do now, will into the future. But you clearly demonstrate the one quality conservatives possess, only bad things will happen if you do this! Too predictive. Hopefully the selfish and greedy will lose this battle and some start to UHC will pass in America. But if it doesn't, Americans suffer, won't be the first or last time. You do realize that if we listened to you guys we'd still be living in caves howling at the moon. Progress comes slow...slow....

    http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/H...l?show=reviews

    "He argues that a triplet of 'rhetorical' criticisms--perversity, futility, and jeopardy--'has been unfailingly leveled' by 'reactionaries' at each major progressive reform of the past 300 years--those T. H. Marshall identified with the advancement of civil, political and social rights of citizenship...Charmingly written, this book can benefit a diverse readership."


    Damocles, Yes it is rather old, you'd think we'd have progressed a bit more in America?

    And Rasmussen statistics are similar to Fox faux news - unfair and unbalanced. Weird that they are always alone on the right of any issue. Tell you anything.

  15. #60 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    3,470
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 125 Times in 84 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 33 Times in 24 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by midcan5 View Post
    If we stand still as you propose Americans without healthcare will suffer, do now, will into the future. But you clearly demonstrate the one quality conservatives possess, only bad things will happen if you do this! Too predictive. Hopefully the selfish and greedy will lose this battle and some start to UHC will pass in America. But if it doesn't, Americans suffer, won't be the first or last time. You do realize that if we listened to you guys we'd still be living in caves howling at the moon. Progress comes slow...slow....

    http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/H...l?show=reviews

    "He argues that a triplet of 'rhetorical' criticisms--perversity, futility, and jeopardy--'has been unfailingly leveled' by 'reactionaries' at each major progressive reform of the past 300 years--those T. H. Marshall identified with the advancement of civil, political and social rights of citizenship...Charmingly written, this book can benefit a diverse readership."


    Damocles, Yes it is rather old, you'd think we'd have progressed a bit more in America?

    And Rasmussen statistics are similar to Fox faux news - unfair and unbalanced. Weird that they are always alone on the right of any issue. Tell you anything.
    This is the central lie of the far left and the far right. Where did I ONCE say we should "stand still"? Where did I say nothing but bad would result from passing a universal care system? Your posts are becoming little more than the typical lying strawman liberal talking points, right down to the ever-tired "caveman" reference. Have you ONE, just ONE actual, genuine, ORIGINAL thought in that head you have jammed in the donkey's ass? Or are you so oxygen deprived you have nothing left but what your political masters predetermine you should think?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-22-2009, 06:04 PM
  2. Special interests’ on both sides in health fight
    By Cancel 2018. 3 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 08-19-2009, 10:27 PM
  3. The best interests of the child
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-06-2009, 08:09 PM
  4. the main 08 issue.. taxes. this is what people ultimatly vote on
    By Chapdog in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 01-23-2008, 09:11 PM
  5. Replies: 56
    Last Post: 01-14-2008, 07:09 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •