Are you fucking people just stupid or just don't understand what you read...
Its gotta be one or the other...
I said HC promoted by the left...
that certainly doesn't mean our HC is perfect or that our HC doesn't need some reforms....
So....learn to freekin' understand what your reading....
those 'on-line' college degrees you and topcat have were a waste of money....you needed the real thing...
Put blame where it belongs
ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
STY just jizzed in mott's face.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
So a guy doing cheesecake photos for the ladies and who is on record as being pro-choice is you two clowns idea of ethics and values? Hmmm, will wonders never cease!
What are you....fucking stupid or stoned? As the the chronology of the posts on these threads show, I am NOT the one dancing with glee over Brown's election.
I merely pointed out the sheer hypocrisy of a statement by your fellow parrot that you chimed in on. What I said about Brown is a documented, bonafide FACT. TFB for you if the truth isn't to your liking.
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
Put blame where it belongs
ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.
Pay attention, you intellectually impotent cretin. I responded to neocon parrots carrying on about ethics and values. Well, as I pointed out (see above)you neocons were all a twitter about the Massachusetts election of a man that has public stands that CONTRADICT your party's "ethics" and "values". So isn't that voting against your interests?Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
So a guy doing cheesecake photos for the ladies and who is on record as being pro-choice is you two clowns idea of ethics and values? Hmmm, will wonders never cease!
THINK, YOU FOOL, THINK before your fingers hit the keys.....makes you look less foolish. This tag team of you, Dixie and Southie is just truly pathetic!
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
You such a fuckin' moron its a wonder you can breathe and walk at the same time...
WTF have has "MY" party's ethics and values have to do with the thread...?
NOT A THING...you don't even know what party I belong to....
If you mean the voters voted for a man whose values and ethics are different than the voters....thats close to the question asked....but still different
Put blame where it belongs
ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.
To answer the original question the most common reason is because there are those who believe their interests are better met through means different than what others believe. It is nothing less than massive egocentric arrogance to think otherwise. And the arrogance of the left is absolute on this topic. No one will give even a nanometer on their absolute religious-like faith (yes, your bullshit goes way beyond simple belief) that anyone who disagrees with their conclusion can only do so out of ignorance.
The left keeps harping about the need of the right to "join the 21st century". Yet what they support was invented over 80 years ago. So whose heads are truly in the past?
The health systems of Europe, Canada and elsewhere cannot be described as failures. However, neither can they be genuinely called great successes either. We keep heaqring how European systems spend a little more than half per capita what America spends. What they try to hide is the fact that America was spending slightly more than twice as much per capita on health care BEFORE Europe and others went the way of universal care. So universal care does not, in reality, reduce costs on a per-capita basis.
So what DOES cost twice as much? To answer that, we look to quality of care. Yes, most universal systems meet the BASICS of care reasonably adequately, though the (undoubtedly exaggerated) stories of waiting lines and rationed care have a minimal basis of fact to them. But quality of care includes more than whether a hospital has enough acetaminophen, gauze rolls and xray films on hand to meet needs. Quality includes what some on here have decried as "unnecessary luxuries" like private rooms, or comfortable visitor chairs, which, if a universal plan cannot sustain, can be done away with.
But, we Americans like our luxuries, and we always will. Not only that, but there are many (including myself, having spent innumerable hours in hospitals watching over friends and family) who strongly disagree with the claims that things like private rooms, comfortable visitor chairs, cable television, etc. are not a part of quality of health care.
If universal plans cannot sustain the type of care we have in the U.S., if one price of universal care is to get rid of "luxuries", then IMO, we need to start looking for a different answer than the one others came up with a long, long time ago. IMO, the better answers to addressing health care problems in our society will (or should) come from ORIGINAL thinking, not copy-cat thinking.
Last edited by Good Luck; 02-03-2010 at 10:22 PM.
"It [the draft] is duty rather than slavery. I part with the author on the caviler idea that individual freedom (whatever that may be to the person) leads to nirvana, anyone older that 12 knows that is BS."
-(Midcan5)
"Allow me to masturbate my patriotism furiously and publicly at this opportunity."
-(Ib1yysguy)
"There is no 'equal opportunity' today unless the government makes it so."
-(apple0154 )
"abortion is not killing Its birth control"
-(Desh)
TC...
Go back under your rock and let the adults play....
Put blame where it belongs
ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.
Put blame where it belongs
ATF decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
It that time," the NRA wrote in a statement. "The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semiautomatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations."
The ATF and Obama admin. ignored the NRA recommendations.
Ahhh, the rantings of an intellectually bankrupt neocon blowhard.Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Pay attention, you intellectually impotent cretin. I responded to neocon parrots carrying on about ethics and values. Well, as I pointed out (see above)you neocons were all a twitter about the Massachusetts election of a man that has public stands that CONTRADICT your party's "ethics" and "values". So isn't that voting against your interests?
THINK, YOU FOOL, THINK before your fingers hit the keys.....makes you look less foolish. This tag team of you, Dixie and Southie is just truly pathetic!
You can't avoid the point I made, genius......the neocon GOPers have been wailing about "culture wars", the "moral bankruptcy" of liberals and Democrats, and have been ardently opposed to abortion. And yet, they celebrate the election of a man who poses damn near nude for a magazine and who has gone on record as being in favor of a woman's right to choose an abortion.
Now by any sane, rational and logical take....if you are a neocon/Republican and voted for Brown, then you voted AGAINST two interests of yours and your party.
To date I have YET to see you post anything arbitrary to the policies and actions of the last administration. In fact, you've seem to have made it a hobby to follow me around on this thread and rail against ANY support I've made about Obama or criticism I've made about his opponents. So your party politics and/or ideological leanings are pretty clear....for you to deny such in lieu of your history on these threads is ludicrous at best.
Bottom line: my statement stands valid...you and the other two buffoons have exposed your hypocrisy and have made things worst with your illogical denial. Carry on.
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
George Orwell
Bookmarks