Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: The precious government caused more panic than needed..

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Canton, Oh
    Posts
    3,663
    Thanks
    135
    Thanked 161 Times in 112 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 5 Times in 5 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default The precious government caused more panic than needed..

    Vindication for Lewis, damnation for Bernanke

    4/23/09 * Marketwatch

    NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- If Ken Lewis is telling the truth -- and he'd be foolish to lie to New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo -- then Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson were more than concerned about the financial crisis. They were panicking.

    Why else would the two most important administration officials presiding over the financial crisis play hardball backroom politics with Lewis, the chief executive of Bank of America Corp. (BAC), who had taken significant risk by acquiring Merrill Lynch & Co. last September?

    Lewis testified that Paulson used threatening language to push through the deal, according to a letter released by Cuomo's office Thursday.

    "'I'm going to be very blunt, we're very supportive on Bank of America and we want to be of help'," Lewis claims Paulson told him, according to testimony released Thursday. Lewis said he considered invoking a material adverse change, or MAC, clause to pull out of the Merrill deal in December, reasoning that Merrill's financial picture deteriorated severely in just three months' time. But he adds he was warned by Paulson to stick with Merrill.

    "I can't recall if he [Paulson] said, 'We would remove the board and management if you called [a MAC],' or if he said, 'We would do it if you intended to'," Lewis testified.

    Lewis backed down in the December showdown and was left to take the blame when Merrill reported a stunning $15 billion loss for the fourth quarter, after the deal closed at year's end.

    If his testimony is correct, the story seems to vindicate Lewis, in part, for his decision to go through with the deal. One could argue Lewis should have called Paulson's bluff, but when you're facing two regulators threatening your job and your bank, well, one can't blame Lewis for taking the escape route offered to him.

    As for Paulson, his legacy is further tarnished by the heavy-handed tactics charged by Lewis. Paulson's alleged wishes that the backroom agreement would not be a "disclosable event," or that he would remove the board of a public company, suggest power run amok.

    Bernanke's reputation is tarnished worse. He stepped aside and let Paulson play bad cop even though he clearly had doubts about how the Bank of America situation was being handled. Bernanke still leads the Fed.

    But his influence and judgment have suffered self-inflicted wounds.

    -- David Weidner
    Add this on to the illegal seizure of the biggest Savings and Loan bank, creating more panic, and what the hell would you do if you were a banker? They had to protect themselves from the government as much as possible. Stop lending and hold on to your cash boys, the government wants to take control. Just another f'in blunder... and people still think we need more regulation. Ridiculous. Whatever, I'll just make more money off of more court battles with the government.

    BTW, the OTS ruled WaMu was well capitilized, but they seized them anyways because of fear, then sold their hundreds of billions in assets for 1.9Billion. If you think i don't know what I'm talking about, then just look at the WaMu thread, read a little bit, and watch in amazement as it all comes to fruition.
    You Are Not So Smart Podcast - A celebration of Self-Delusion

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    49,801
    Thanks
    1,830
    Thanked 7,353 Times in 5,599 Posts
    Groans
    238
    Groaned 801 Times in 749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DigitalDave View Post
    Add this on to the illegal seizure of the biggest Savings and Loan bank, creating more panic, and what the hell would you do if you were a banker? They had to protect themselves from the government as much as possible. Stop lending and hold on to your cash boys, the government wants to take control. Just another f'in blunder... and people still think we need more regulation. Ridiculous. Whatever, I'll just make more money off of more court battles with the government.

    BTW, the OTS ruled WaMu was well capitilized, but they seized them anyways because of fear, then sold their hundreds of billions in assets for 1.9Billion. If you think i don't know what I'm talking about, then just look at the WaMu thread, read a little bit, and watch in amazement as it all comes to fruition.
    http://www.wamustory.com/
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

Similar Threads

  1. USA caused losses
    By Canceled.LTroll.27 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 04-03-2009, 05:44 PM
  2. man caused disaster?? WTF????
    By SmarterthanYou in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 03-22-2009, 03:50 PM
  3. Panic Button Installed...
    By Damocles in forum Announcements
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-17-2008, 02:49 PM
  4. Name something good religion has caused
    By robdastud in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 441
    Last Post: 05-22-2007, 09:49 AM
  5. CCD caused by cell phones ?
    By uscitizen in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-16-2007, 09:30 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •