Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 71

Thread: Are we all now pro government regulation?

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default Are we all now pro government regulation?

    Or is it being talked about just to defray blame on the party who had control for the last eigth years?

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    ahahahahaha


    they wont answer?

    I'm so surprized

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    So I guess that means you are not pro gov regs on the markets?

    Then you should be praising everyone who voted for GLB act 1999 instaed of blaming them huh?

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    62,857
    Thanks
    3,734
    Thanked 20,360 Times in 14,088 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 649 Times in 616 Posts

    Default

    Sorry to interupt your party but who are you talking to?

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,347
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    I was wondering the same thing. and what is she talking about?

  6. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    47,970
    Thanks
    4,579
    Thanked 3,084 Times in 2,618 Posts
    Groans
    3,368
    Groaned 2,119 Times in 1,992 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    Sorry to interupt your party but who are you talking to?
    dude, that is one of the funniest posts i have read on a message board

  7. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Why wont you guys answer the question?

  8. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,491
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    I think all along, most intelligent individuals were never for NO regulation, just the right regulation. Something that didn't get done because of people like waxman and frank
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  9. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Oh yeah in what way?

    What was wrong with Glass Steagal?

  10. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    49,801
    Thanks
    1,830
    Thanked 7,353 Times in 5,599 Posts
    Groans
    238
    Groaned 801 Times in 749 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    Oh yeah in what way?

    What was wrong with Glass Steagal?
    ask Clinton... he killed it.
    Quote from Cypress:
    "Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.

    They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "

  11. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,685
    Thanks
    6,597
    Thanked 12,131 Times in 9,660 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 504 Times in 477 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    The truth always shuts evince right the hell up.

  12. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    ask Clinton... he killed it.


    all by his little self huh?

  13. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,685
    Thanks
    6,597
    Thanked 12,131 Times in 9,660 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 504 Times in 477 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    all by his little self huh?
    Nor did bush fuck everything up all by himself. Both parties are corrupt shitbars. When you realize that, you won't be quite as stupid anymore.

  14. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    You guys refuse to face the fact that every time regulations need to be made the conservatives fight them and say its too much government control over the market.

    So the whole Clinton signing it mess just proves no Democrat should ever trust an R to deregulate anything honsetly.

    You can have Clinton.

    Fuck him and his far too moderate fiscal policy.

  15. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,685
    Thanks
    6,597
    Thanked 12,131 Times in 9,660 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 504 Times in 477 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    You guys refuse to face the fact that every time regulations need to be made the conservatives fight them and say its too much government control over the market.

    So the whole Clinton signing it mess just proves no Democrat should ever trust an R to deregulate anything honsetly.

    You can have Clinton.

    Fuck him and his far too moderate fiscal policy.
    And too much government involvement always leads to abuse by interested parties. That's what you won't face.

Similar Threads

  1. food regulation
    By Don Quixote in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-21-2009, 08:43 AM
  2. I predict new toothless finiancial regulation
    By uscitizen in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-11-2008, 01:18 PM
  3. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-08-2008, 12:32 PM
  4. I think deregulation and self regulation work
    By Cypress in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 03-16-2008, 03:37 PM
  5. Bush is pro CEO salary/bonus regulation ?
    By uscitizen in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-31-2007, 02:56 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •