ahahahahaha
they wont answer?
I'm so surprized
Or is it being talked about just to defray blame on the party who had control for the last eigth years?
ahahahahaha
they wont answer?
I'm so surprized
So I guess that means you are not pro gov regs on the markets?
Then you should be praising everyone who voted for GLB act 1999 instaed of blaming them huh?
Sorry to interupt your party but who are you talking to?
I was wondering the same thing. and what is she talking about?
Why wont you guys answer the question?
I think all along, most intelligent individuals were never for NO regulation, just the right regulation. Something that didn't get done because of people like waxman and frank
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Oh yeah in what way?
What was wrong with Glass Steagal?
Quote from Cypress:
"Scientists don't use "averages". Maybe armchair supertools on message boards ascribe some meaning to "averages" between two random data points. And maybe clueless amatuers "draw a straight line" through two random end data points to define a "trend". Experts don't.
They use mean annual and five year means in trend analysis. Don't tell me I have to explain the difference to you. "
The truth always shuts evince right the hell up.
You guys refuse to face the fact that every time regulations need to be made the conservatives fight them and say its too much government control over the market.
So the whole Clinton signing it mess just proves no Democrat should ever trust an R to deregulate anything honsetly.
You can have Clinton.
Fuck him and his far too moderate fiscal policy.
Bookmarks