Search:

Penny Pritzker is a woman.

Also, too, I'm sure it's really convenient to go through life as a knee-jerk reactionary ignorant slob, but goddamn man . . .

What's worse: eating a bowl of hair and finding a fingernail or eating a bowl of fingernails and finding a hair?

Uh, because blue state citizens earn shitloads more than their red state counterparts.

Not sure it's wise to get your science news from a pastor's website, but that's just me.

The idiocy thing kind of undercuts the conspiracy theory angle though, doesn't it? I mean, you have to be pretty damned smart and sophisticated to come up with some of these conspiracies in the...

OK, but, like, you have to say that the current set up is "whack" in that there manifesto, otherwise I can't abide it.

Strong dollar is great when we have full employment, but when we have low aggregate demand increasing demand through exports is the appropriate policy. Lower prices through cheap exports isn't all...

Updating a previous item:




Completely understandable. Happened to me last week. Mine was a clerical error, too.


...

We didn't really have a "strong dollar" policy during much of the Reagan/Bush/Clinton era. Basically, from the beginning of Reagan's 2nd term through the end of Clinton's 1st term, the dollar was...

LOLers:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjCHD41I7ok

This about sums up much of SF's problems:

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/05/this-is-the-biggest-mistake-60-year-old-men-make-about-the-economy/275954/

Although he ain't 60, he...

I have no interest in talking about fiscal policy with you at all. I just think you're hilarious. So let's get back to the monetary policy issues, mkay sunshine?

Uh, what's the can in this metaphor?

Said the self-identified "fiscal conservative."

LOL.

It might.



Yes.

That's really smart.

Giving people (not banks) money would be a good start.

Also, too, this:

http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2013/05/22/dont-fear-the-bubble/

And this:

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/17/too-much-talk-about-liquidity/

And this:

We're talking about monetary policy, SF.

Instead, let's induce another recession now because we're afraid we might have another recession at some unidentified point in the future.

I've heard it before, but rarely and not recently. Mostly I've heard it brought up much like you've brought it up - to pretend that people use it all the time when really they don't.

6% unemployment.

Also, too, I don't necessarily agree with the FED's chosen method, but it's better than nothing.

Who are "they?" Name some names.

Unemployment is still way too high for the FED to back off. It'd be one thing is fiscal policy was expansionary, but it isn't.