that you can seriously ask this question tells all of us just how much you hate freedom.
Type: Posts; User: SmarterthanYou; Excluded Forums: vBCms Comments
that you can seriously ask this question tells all of us just how much you hate freedom.
classic ignorance. you should probably run away now and refrain from looking worse.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/13/indefinite-detention-americans_n_3437923.html
The U.S. House of Representatives voted again Thursday to allow the indefinite military detention of...
citizens is another code word for subject. citizens are not allowed to act in the name of law and order. that is for your superior citizens, the police, to handle. you will learn this or be...
jesus christ you stupid moron. have you really lost your fucking mind? can you not pay enough attention to remember that i've been criticizing and accusing BOTH Obama and Bush over this crap?
stop...
wrong
yes, you should.
wrong.
http://tbrnews.com/news/redondo_beach/redondo-man-shot-at-by-police-during-dorner-pursuit-to/article_c0c04082-d778-11e2-a86b-0019bb2963f4.html
yeah, tell me they weren't looking to kill Dorner...
maybe you should start the thread over.
I mentioned that your silence would be demonstrated to the jury. I never said that a jury would consider you guilty. the flaw seems to be your assumption
how so? by exposing their criminality?
the right to counsel is a right not listed in the bill of rights.
no, I don't believe so. I've seen a few cases where a defendant/suspect has answered some questions while invoking their 5th for...
yet if he had said clearly that he is invoking his 5th Amendment rights, his silence would not have been demonstrated to the jury. So what I said was correct.
maybe you should try something intelligent, like reading the article, and then come back and see if you have any questions of why.
what this does now is that if you are NOT in custody and have NOT had your miranda read, yet choose to remain silent without explicitly saying you're exercising your 5th Amendment rights.....then...
so IDs are not required to exercise a right?
au contraire, as was pointed out above, it seems that the courts are making it so that you have to state unequivocally that you're exercising a right (namely silence) and that if you do not, then...
http://news.yahoo.com/court-says-pre-miranda-silence-used-142855241.html
typical BS conservative ruling.
Obama, Obama, he's our man..if he can't do it, so what?
I find it ridiculously amusing that for all the whining that the libs did about this 'surveillance' during the Bush years, that now they are ready to string snowden up as a traitor. partisanship at...
i'll just consider myself correct, and smarter than you.
so you have no cite. that's all you needed to say.
Interesting........
http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/crime-courts/hearing-master-no-longer-works-court-after-marshal-flap
A family court hearing master is no longer an employee of the...
http://www.fox5vegas.com/story/21420578/nhp-releases-video-of-las-vegas-constables-dui-arrest
Video captured by several Nevada Highway Patrol on-board cameras shows why a trooper suspected Las...
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57589495-38/nsa-admits-listening-to-u.s-phone-calls-without-warrants/
Snowden is an even bigger hero now.