everything you've said is true, except for the bolded part. The founding fathers wrote and ratified the US Constitution as a limitation on their new federal government, ONLY.
Type: Posts; User: SmarterthanYou
everything you've said is true, except for the bolded part. The founding fathers wrote and ratified the US Constitution as a limitation on their new federal government, ONLY.
not factually correct. The US Constitution is a contract between the states and the federal government, where the states surrendered some of their power to the federal government, limited as it is....
like other irrational and emotional types, LV is so full of self loathing and hatred that even the slightest disagreement with her desired state of civilian subjugation to big government triggers her...
this is why feminism is destroying society. women can't restrain their emotions and they get all triggered and start spewing bullshit
sorry I triggered you.
not how it worked.............but you go with that and continue to look like a moron.
yeah, this isn't an equivalent case. stewart set a price and the buyer agreed. obviously, it was worth that much to the buyer.
YES, it is indeed a police state.
just like the protestors where rittenhouse tried to speak...........so what crime was there?
did i say that?
convenient ignorance doesn't suit you. Biden has been in politics for over 45 years and during those decades, several of his family members have benefitted through their name,...
this is historically inaccurate. The 2nd Amendment did not apply to the states until Heller. After the passage of the 14th Amendment, the SCOTUS usurped even more power from the states and the people...
the pattern is that governments will absolutely ignore their prescribed limitations of power and nearly every time, the people will let them get away with it because it doesn't immediately affect...
only those states that do not have their own right to keep and bear arms in the state constitutions
how the hell do you come to that conclusion when you've advocated for the SCOTUS to be the final arbiter of what it means??????
EVERYONE with rational and logical thinking knows what they meant by the prefatory clause because it is written about numerous times before, during, and after ratification. Those who do NOT know that...
what, exactly, needs to be fixed?
good thing that that isnt what I said.
everything you posted here, in an extremely juvenile manner, is 100% incorrect, except for the part where he told the cops he had to shoot someone.
so you think that liberals have the right of self defense against conservatives, but conservatives have to just take it and die. got it.
:dealwithit:
shit like this is a prime example that displays the incredible lack of knowledge that democrats have with economies
that would be a board decision. they set the CEO salary
ooooh, triggered.
If they come after me with threats, I have the right to protect myself.
so you think that the government can create a military branch by law that negates a protected right of the people?
sure, but NEVER have they been held to account for not providing protection to any specific individual, as noted by the SCOTUS.
and yet we let them ignore it most of the time.