Democrats don't want to save America

Maybe for " holding elections for Senators and Representatives " but not Presidents as it states in the CONSTITUTION it is up to the state legislature to decide how the want to appoint they delegates to the EC.

Think so?

  • The SAVE Act applies uniformly because “federal elections” are treated holistically in statute. The National Voter Registration Act/NVRA (which the bill amends) and the bill itself define coverage as registration for any “election for Federal office,” which has always included the presidential contest (via electors). Congress has regulated presidential voter registration, ID requirements, and roll maintenance for decades through the same NVRA framework without successful Article II challenges. The Help America Vote Act/HAVA (2002) imposed new ID and database rules for all federal elections, including presidential, without being invalidated on Electors Clause grounds.
  • Once a state chooses popular election of electors, federal procedural rules can attach. The Supreme Court has never held that Congress is powerless over the mechanics of a state-run popular vote for presidential electors. It has upheld uniform national rules (e.g., Election Day timing) and treated federal elections as subject to congressional oversight where states have opted into popular voting. The core requirement (citizenship) is already federal law (18 U.S.C. § 611); the SAVE Act only changes the verification method. States remain free to appoint electors by other means (legislature appointment, etc.) if they wish, though none do.
 
Think so?

  • The SAVE Act applies uniformly because “federal elections” are treated holistically in statute. The National Voter Registration Act/NVRA (which the bill amends) and the bill itself define coverage as registration for any “election for Federal office,” which has always included the presidential contest (via electors). Congress has regulated presidential voter registration, ID requirements, and roll maintenance for decades through the same NVRA framework without successful Article II challenges. The Help America Vote Act/HAVA (2002) imposed new ID and database rules for all federal elections, including presidential, without being invalidated on Electors Clause grounds.
  • Once a state chooses popular election of electors, federal procedural rules can attach. The Supreme Court has never held that Congress is powerless over the mechanics of a state-run popular vote for presidential electors. It has upheld uniform national rules (e.g., Election Day timing) and treated federal elections as subject to congressional oversight where states have opted into popular voting. The core requirement (citizenship) is already federal law (18 U.S.C. § 611); the SAVE Act only changes the verification method. States remain free to appoint electors by other means (legislature appointment, etc.) if they wish, though none do.
Want to make sure the peoples wish is observed.
It would be Unconstitutional but instead of having " winner take all " states Make a federal law and have it go by Congressional districts,
IF a state has say 27 districts and 20 vote Republican the Republicans would get those 20 delegates and the Dems would get the other 7 the districts voted for,
As it is now a state could have 27 districts and if 14 vote one way all 27 have to go that way, that is taking away the peoples choice in the other 13 districts .
 
"Liking" someone (or not) is no way to decide whom to support politically.



We both know what the only reason you don't support Trump is.

Don't we, Ms. Democrat?
Yes, I've been vocal about my reasons for not supporting him... the lying, the grifting, the misogyny, the 34 felony convictions...
 
We both know that none of that would matter a jot to you if he'd remained a Democrat, don't we? :nodyes:
That's your fever dream, not reality. Btw, read this email I got from Fetterman (who I dumped, ICYMI.) Let's see what he does now that trump is sending over 5000 troops.

Thank you for reaching out to my office. I appreciate hearing from you.

On Saturday, February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel carried out Operation Epic Fury on Iran. I am grateful for the brave Americans who participated in this coordinated attack. My deepest condolences are with the families of the servicemembers who were lost during this military action. Supporting our members in the Armed Forces and veterans is always a top priority of mine.

The removal of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is a positive development for global security, and it was necessary to produce real peace in the region. Khamenei wielded power for over 36 years, silenced dissenters, and murdered innocent civilians. Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism and simply cannot have access to a nuclear weapon. It is a threat not only to the United States, but also our allies in the Middle East, like Israel.

On Wednesday, March 4th, I voted against the War Powers Resolution that was brought up in the United States Senate. Every member of the Senate agrees we cannot allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon. The President was correct in taking these actions, and I will continue to stand against Iran and with our ally Israel. However, under no circumstances do I support putting U.S. soldiers on the ground in Iran.

Our State Department and Armed Forces now have the sacred obligation of keeping Americans in the region safe and helping them relocate if necessary.

Thank you again for contacting me to share your thoughts. Please do not hesitate to reach out in the future about other issues of importance to you. If I can be of assistance, or if you’d like to learn more about my work on behalf of Pennsylvanians and our commonwealth, I encourage you to visit my website, https://www.fetterman.senate.gov/
 
Last edited:
So you say. The magic "D" after any politician's name renders you complaisant. You give a pass to people you like, and you like (or dislike) people based on political affiliations. :nodyes:
I like or dislike people based on what they say and how they say it.

Btw, it's hilarious watching you and the puppets on X slam liberals for not supporting the trump dictatorship. :LOL:
 
I like or dislike people based on what they say and how they say it.

It's not a question of "liking". You aren't a schoolgirl discussing your crushes.

Btw, it's hilarious watching you and the puppets on X slam liberals for not supporting the trump dictatorship. :LOL:

I don't recall "slamming liberals for not supporting the (supposed) trump 'dictatorship' on X".
 
Back
Top