Rightwing televangelist and demon-spawn Jimmy Swaggart recently died at age 90

Seriously dude I'm not joking here: you are asking me to prove a universal negative claim. That's absurd. That's something a moron would suggest.

You suggest I have "faith" that I don't find your reasons for God to be compelling????

Whatever you are smoking, please tell me so I can find the edible form! fuuuuuuuuuck.

Since you can't prove it, then you are operating on faith.
Haha
Haha.
 
Since you can't prove it, then you are operating on faith.
Haha
Haha.

Wow. You actually said that I'm operating on faith that I can't do something I'm not even doing? Or do you again, think it is my "faith" that I am unconvinced by your claims for God?

I'm making NO CLAIMS whatsoever. Not one. Thus there is no burden on me whatsoever. None. Zip. Zilch Nada.

The fact that you think I have to prove something I never claimed, or you think I have "faith" that I am unconvinced by your claims, says more about you than you can understand given your lack of any training in this area.

Might want to have your buddy, Cy, Google AI the concept of the burden of proof. ;)
 
I'm making NO CLAIMS whatsoever. Not one. Thus there is no burden on me whatsoever. None. Zip. Zilch Nada.
It's a very convenient debate strategy to say you have nothing to defend, while reserving the right to complain about theists.

Atheism involves the claim that inanimate matter and energy is all that exists. Otherwise, you wouldn't be atheist.

That worldview is physical materialism.

That's a philosophical claim, a philosophical worldview that requires a certain amount of belief and faith.
 
It's a very convenient debate strategy to say you have nothing to defend, while reserving the right to complain about theists.

Atheism involves the claim that inanimate matter and energy is all that exists. Otherwise, you wouldn't be atheist.

That worldview is physical materialism.

That's a philosophical claim, a philosophical worldview that requires a certain amount of belief and faith.
Atheism is not a claim. It requires no faith.
 
It is not Jerusalem. See Revelations 17.
It is not Jerusalem. See Revelations 17.

Jerusalem is the only city that fits.



The fact that history has "Seven Hills" (or "Mountains")associated with FOUR world kingdoms: Babylon, Rome, Byzantium, and Jerusalem,there has been some confusion about which of these (or, perhaps, another"New City") was the intention of the apostle John who was writing forChrist Jesus in the Book of Revelation. The truth is, however, when one looks at the subject of the Book of Revelation carefully, there is only one of those"Cities of Seven Hills" that could possibly be the subject of the End-Time revelation. That is the City of Jerusalem. The "MysteryBabylon" of the Book of Revelation is none other than Jerusalem!


The last world kingdom will be headquartered in Jerusalem,not in Rome, Babylon on the Euphrates or in Byzantium, or anywhere else. The Antichrist will come to Jerusalem.



Other arguments re Rev. 17:



... and many more. The 'Anti-Christ' argument is the most compelling, as is the fact that the corruption and criticisms of Jesus re Jews turning away from the teachings of Moses originates with the return of the exiles from Babylon and setting themselves up as the only 'real Jews' is a direct reference to Babylon. The Anti-Christ isn't going to set himself up in Rome, a gentile city.
 
Back
Top