cops murder doctor in his own home

they did not. tell me you believe government/police without reservation.

The deceased, identified as 38-year-old Aleksandr Lanis, was the subject of an arrest warrant for first-degree harassment.
 
they did not. tell me you believe government/police without reservation.

Aleksandr Lanis, 38. Police said the officers told Lanis he was under arrest and asked him numerous times to step out of his home.
 
they did not. tell me you believe government/police without reservation.

According to KSDK, investigators said that on the morning of March 21st, two St. Louis County officers went to Aleksander Lanis' home to arrest him. Lanis, a doctor, previously worked at Mercy Hospital in Missouri. In the briefing video, a police spokesperson said, "The investigation was related to a reported harassment first-degree and tampering with a motor vehicle in the south county precinct".
 
that those individual police officers are not held to account. More often than not, cities settle to get rid of lawsuits where their police clearly broke the law. If a settlement isn't reached, the cops rely on qualified immunity exceptions to say that they were acting in good faith. If that doesn't work and somehow a case should go to trial, those cops rely on people LIKE YOU that believe government should have extra leeway to do their job.
well if I was in a jury and they had no warrant I would have them do time.
 
that those individual police officers are not held to account. More often than not, cities settle to get rid of lawsuits where their police clearly broke the law. If a settlement isn't reached, the cops rely on qualified immunity exceptions to say that they were acting in good faith. If that doesn't work and somehow a case should go to trial, those cops rely on people LIKE YOU that believe government should have extra leeway to do their job.
So if the cops didn’t have a warrant don’t you think the family would sue?
 
No guarantee but juries have a history of siding correctly and unanimously with unpopular outcomes.
George Zimmerman, Rittenhouse.
No way the juries were 100% sypathetic with those two but they followed the rule of law.
well that's just historically incorrect. and given the case law I posted, did they really follow the rule of law?
 
Back
Top