Based Chad
Was it me?
lonewolf antifa boogaloo Gilbert.
and i've displayed to you that 9 times out of 10, they are not....even with clear video evidence because of people like youI'm openly saying they should be arrested if they had no warrant.
you're not arguing in good faith anymore.
you're on some agenda shit.
do you believe in the concept of public law enforcement?
Because that's what they do, you fucking moron. They don't know who else is in the house. They don't know what weapons are in the house. I don't like you enough to care, but I am strongly encouraging you - if someone else is in the building with you right now - ask them to make sure you're ok. I have never seen you act this erratically. You're not well.if there was already an arrest warrant, why did the police officers try to coerce him in to exiting his home??????
They did not tell him that. you are lying. at least you made clear that the only reason you're lying is that you hate being made a fool of by me.What in the fuck are you talking about? There was an arrest warrant for Lanis. The police told him that. He pulled a gun on them. What the fuck did you think was going to happen? Have you slept?
again, is it your belief that the mainstream media would only report facts, because police only report facts?I see your logic. If the local news station reports that the cops had an arrest warrant, this is a clear indication they didn’t.![]()
are not what?and i've displayed to you that 9 times out of 10, they are not....even with clear video evidence because of people like you
and now you've proven that you have absolutely no concept of how the real world works. keep sucking that cop cock, you beta kneeling gov worshipperBecause that's what they do, you fucking moron. They don't know who else is in the house. They don't know what weapons are in the house. I don't like you enough to care, but I am strongly encouraging you - if someone else is in the building with you right now - ask them to make sure you're ok. I have never seen you act this erratically. You're not well.
And they FIRST tried to taser him.Let’s see. He was being arrested for harassing the family of his wife he was divorcing. Nothing wrong or out of the ordinary there.
Lanis resisted arrest. Never good but no reason to kill him.
He pulled a handgun on the cops while resisting arrest. Uh, this kinda changes everything.
So if the source was government it must be fake? Is that your logic?the media outlets get their info from gov sources..............how do you not know this?
Of course not but you’ve provided no alternate ‘reliable’ source.or are you of the belief that law enforcement agencies completely tell the truth all of the time?
They did. Everything you are posting here indicates an irrational, paranoid denial of facts. This is not normal behavior. Are you on meth?no, but you must me. tell us, WHY, if the police had an actual arrest warrant, that they did not state that up front and that they tried to talk the Dr to exit his home when they didn't need to, IF THEY HAD A WARRANT???????
after all of these years of me posting about qualified immunity, you now want a definition??????Im open to being educated on what qualified immunity actually is.
I'm sure it's not "you don't need an arrest warrant to arrest people".
these cops should be arrested if they have have no warrant.
I don't know how I can be more fair to an old friend.
no, but you must me. tell us, WHY, if the police had an actual arrest warrant, that they did not state that up front and that they tried to talk the Dr to exit his home when they didn't need to, IF THEY HAD A WARRANT???????
Looks like STY is one of these defund the police characters.And they FIRST tried to taser him.
Did you watch the video you posted, you psychotic mess?They did not tell him that. you are lying. at least you made clear that the only reason you're lying is that you hate being made a fool of by me.
that those individual police officers are not held to account. More often than not, cities settle to get rid of lawsuits where their police clearly broke the law. If a settlement isn't reached, the cops rely on qualified immunity exceptions to say that they were acting in good faith. If that doesn't work and somehow a case should go to trial, those cops rely on people LIKE YOU that believe government should have extra leeway to do their job.are not what?
^ cuckoo cuckoo ^and now you've proven that you have absolutely no concept of how the real world works. keep sucking that cop cock, you beta kneeling gov worshipper
is this happened they should be fired and prosecuted.after all of these years of me posting about qualified immunity, you now want a definition??????
you clearly do not understand the Constitution if you think that cops can arrest someone from inside their home without a warrant, without exigent circumstances. I'm sorry, is 'exigent circumstances' not in your vocabulary?
are you telling me that government always tells the truth??????So if the source was government it must be fake? Is that your logic?
What source would you consider to be reliable?
Of course not but you’ve provided no alternate ‘reliable’ source.
They had a warrant.after all of these years of me posting about qualified immunity, you now want a definition??????
you clearly do not understand the Constitution if you think that cops can arrest someone from inside their home without a warrant, without exigent circumstances. I'm sorry, is 'exigent circumstances' not in your vocabulary?