If questioning election results is treason...
- Thread starter Legion
- Start date
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Hmm. Lost the touch still I see.
You went beyond that from the getgo when it was presented as being the truth when it was brought up without any legitimacy to it being so. Then people carried those falsehoods and committed terrible acts. Well, what do you know, it's another square filled in Third Reich bingo. Lucky for us we will never let them get that far in taking falsehoods.
The truth just makes them drool.
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
Oh Legion there you go using facts on the marxists
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Don't fall for his bait. It's obvious.
It's also done in Congress when the electoral votes are counted.
DEMOCRATS objected to the election results in 2001, 2005, and 2017, hypocrite.
"copy and paste" keeps regurgitating the same lame stuff he has already been embarrassed on
In 2001, 2006, 2017, the Democrat candidate conceded the race, it was over, some still objected to the results, but as far as the party was concerned it was history, and, in all those races the Democrat candidate did not lead the charge to declare the election invalidate, probably cause they had no proof, something that hasn't stood in Donny's way
As a sidenote, in 2001 it was Al Gore, shouting down Maxine Waters to declare officially as VP the race was history, and in 2017, it was Joe Biden again acting as VP who ended discussion by saying enough was enough it is over
But we are sure to see "copy and paste" run with the same stuff again, that is what makes him "copy and paste"
Poor Concart - is he ignorant, or just trying to obfuscate?
DEMOCRATS in Congress objected to the electoral vote count 3 times in the last 20 years.
In 2001, a procession of DEMOCRAT House members, including a dozen members of the Congressional Black Caucus, protested during the joint session. They spoke of alleged voter suppression in communities of color and said the votes that were cast had been miscounted. They begged for at least one senator to join them so as to force a debate and a vote on the Florida electors.
Four years later, the January 2005 joint session of Congress heard the Electoral College result from Bush's reelection over DEMOCRAT Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts (who did not attend). A DEMOCRAT House member of Ohio, Stephanie Tubbs Jones, rose to object to the count from her state. It mattered, because without Ohio's electoral votes, Bush would not have had the 270 needed to win.
Jones said there had been irregularities and defects in her state, including a lack of voting sites in communities of color. She was supported by Sen. Barbara Boxer, a DEMOCRAT from California. The House and Senate separated, debated for two hours and voted to accept the Ohio count as reported. Boxer's was the only vote to the contrary in the Senate.
In 2017, several DEMOCRAT members objected to the acceptance of the electoral vote for Trump. "Mr. President, I object because people are horrified," said Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif. The presiding officer was the vice president of that era, Joe Biden. He asked if the objection was being joined by a senator and was answered in the negative.
https://www.npr.org/2021/01/05/952883116/objecting-to-electoral-votes-in-congress-recalls-bitter-moments-in-history
DEMOCRATS in Congress objected to the electoral vote count 3 times in the last 20 years.
In 2001, a procession of DEMOCRAT House members, including a dozen members of the Congressional Black Caucus, protested during the joint session. They spoke of alleged voter suppression in communities of color and said the votes that were cast had been miscounted. They begged for at least one senator to join them so as to force a debate and a vote on the Florida electors.
Four years later, the January 2005 joint session of Congress heard the Electoral College result from Bush's reelection over DEMOCRAT Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts (who did not attend). A DEMOCRAT House member of Ohio, Stephanie Tubbs Jones, rose to object to the count from her state. It mattered, because without Ohio's electoral votes, Bush would not have had the 270 needed to win.
Jones said there had been irregularities and defects in her state, including a lack of voting sites in communities of color. She was supported by Sen. Barbara Boxer, a DEMOCRAT from California. The House and Senate separated, debated for two hours and voted to accept the Ohio count as reported. Boxer's was the only vote to the contrary in the Senate.
In 2017, several DEMOCRAT members objected to the acceptance of the electoral vote for Trump. "Mr. President, I object because people are horrified," said Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif. The presiding officer was the vice president of that era, Joe Biden. He asked if the objection was being joined by a senator and was answered in the negative.
https://www.npr.org/2021/01/05/952883116/objecting-to-electoral-votes-in-congress-recalls-bitter-moments-in-history
I don't recall being "embarrassed", Anchovies.
What difference do you think that makes?
Wrong, Anchovies. Gore appealed to the Supreme Court before he caved, and Biden caved in 2017 because no Senator would join the House DEMOCRATS. That's what killed the objection.
Bet on it, Anchovies.
Hardly evidence. Much of what is listed there has already been debunked.
Some of it is just complete nonsense
Michigan - recount - told not to audit signatures but only count ballots. = That is nonsense on the part of the person making this claim. There are no signatures on any ballots so how can they audit a signature when they count ballots?
The issue of using a sharpie in Arizona? Already debunked.
Some mail in ballots didn't have folds? Already debunked. When a ballot is damaged a new ballot is marked exactly the same as the damaged ballot. The new ballots would not have folds.
Officials approved a Zuckerburg grant? WTF? How does that even effect the ballots and counting?
Everything you say is debunked is told to you by election officials and politicians and a corrupt media and they never bother to prove it. The videos alone show fraud and you deny what your own eyes see. I cannot consider what anyone says that does not believe his own eyes has to say as anything worth reading.
Qanut
Something wrong? You do not see it either. Instead of name calling tell me what you saw.
This is the direction America is going in as well...there must be conformity....there will be conformity....OR ELSE.
THe era of personal liberty is over.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...rs-from-opinions-inconsistent-with-the-party/
THe era of personal liberty is over.