Child porn on Hunter's laptop

I wouldn't expect to see nerdy post credible evidence.

Now you know why he quoted no corroborating text. He was hoping nobody would check.

In my experience, one must lower expectations when dealing with leftists, to avoid disappointment.
 
Why ask me that question?

BTW, the age of consent vary in states and countries. And our ancestors used to marry at a young age. That would not be considered okay by today's standards.

You know there are various form of "underage obsessions", right? And you realize that "underage" can mean 15 to 17 years old?

u said that like 15 to 17 is OK not as bad
 
u said that like 15 to 17 is OK not as bad

I wasn't discussing the morality of it.

Child porn is considered to be pictures/videos of very, very much younger children. If that is the case, why didn't the reporter say so? And if that's the case, then they are in possession of them or accomplices.
 
There are 3 links in this thread now, so which one are you referring to?

Infowars.

The Jewish Voice story cites the "Rocket News" source and says Rocket News "speculates."

The National File story, again from "Rocket News" refers to "potentially, child porn."??

Rocket News is a Japanese source "Bringing you yesterday's news from Japan and Asia, today."
 
"infowars," guarantee to be 100% fake news, there is a reason Alex Jones was thrown off just about every legitimate social media outlet


This is covered in the second sentence of the opening post, have a look:

https://www.infowars.com/posts/did-hunter-bidens-laptop-contain-pedophilic-content/

Did Hunter's laptop contain child porn? If you are a lefty and agree with what this article has to say, just discredit the source instead of the content. If you don't think the article is correct, tell us what is inaccurate in the content.

Glad to see you agree with the article.
 
Infowars.

The Jewish Voice story cites the "Rocket News" source and says Rocket News "speculates."

The National File story, again from "Rocket News" refers to "potentially, child porn."??

Rocket News is a Japanese source "Bringing you yesterday's news from Japan and Asia, today."

The child fetish source is Hunter Biden's laptop.
 
The child fetish source is Hunter Biden's laptop.

"There are all kinds of problems with the new allegations. The emails — purportedly from Vadym Pozharskyi, an adviser to Burisma, the company that paid Hunter Biden to sit on its board — show Pozharskyi thanking him for arranging a meeting with his then-vice president father.

But the sourcing of the emails is hilariously suspect. They were supposedly transferred to a hard drive by a Delaware computer repair store owner from a laptop that Hunter Biden supposedly dropped off. But the owner won’t say he’s certain the customer was Biden, and, weirdly, he never returned for it.

Worse, Bannon and Trump lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani — who alerted the New York Post to the story and provided the hard drive — are refusing to make it available to other news outlets. The “smoking gun” email was reproduced in photo form, and one expert told The Post’s Glenn Kessler that it has no traceable metadata.

Meanwhile, the Biden campaign checked Joe Biden’s schedule and found no such meeting, and no one has shown it happened. (If some kind of perfunctory handshake introduction did happen, even that wouldn’t necessarily show corruption.) That gives the lie to Trump’s claim about what this “smoking gun” supposedly proves.

To top it all off, this nefarious arrangement is cast as the prelude to Biden corruptly forcing out a Ukrainian prosecutor who was supposedly investigating Burisma, to protect his son’s business arrangements.

But that story is based on fiction: The ouster of the prosecutor was backed by international institutions because he was corrupt, and there was no investigation of Burisma at the time.

Bottom line: Biden just didn’t abuse his official powers to do anything corrupt on his son’s behalf, and this new fakery doesn’t change that at all. So what is it supposed to accomplish? We know from Bannon himself.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...candal-has-deeper-purpose-bannon-revealed-it/
 
Info Wars doesn't even count as fake news. It is beneath that.

Hunter doesn't strike me as into underage stuff. He has enough problems with adult women.
 
Right now, all we have is a couple of dubious photos of Hunnter Biden and a story about one (or three) laptops that seems to change everytime the computer repair man is interviewed.

Until the FBI formally charges anyone, I treat this as nothing more than Trump desperately flailing to stay afloat in this race.
 
https://www.infowars.com/posts/did-hunter-bidens-laptop-contain-pedophilic-content/

Did Hunter's laptop contain child porn? If you are a lefty and agree with what this article has to say, just discredit the source instead of the content. If you don't think the article is correct, tell us what is inaccurate in the content.

Discrediting the source IS discrediting the content. Why else are sources discredited?

I could be wrong. Maybe Hunter got corrupted when he visited the pedophiles in Hillary's and Obama's pizza store basement.

(The Russians do seem to get a kick out of targeting Trump's opponents as child lovers. Could this be a not so subtle warning to their guy that he better play ball or the tape they have on him will find its way to the FBI?)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top