John McShame is a real pill

Thanks for confessing that the GOP has no heart... Many want to see the poor die, as can be seen on these very pages.

Sensible people don't attempt to run a nation on their feelings, attractive as that concept may be to feminized DEMOCRATS.

The problem with the noble-sounding inclusivity crusades of the left usually ends up being financial.

Obamacare is a failure for a variety of reasons, none of them attributable to bloodthirsty, selfish demons.

Sucks to be Buck. :rofl2:
 
Really?

Everyone assumed that the Christmas Eve 2009 Senate bill would be tweaked considerably to conform more with the House bill passed two months previously. But that strategy wouldn’t work, because the Democrats no longer had the 60th vote in the Senate to end debate. What to do? They decided to have the House take up the identical bill that the Senate passed on Christmas Eve. It passed on March 21, 2010, by a 219 – 212 vote. This time, no Republicans came on board, and 34 Democrats voted against. President Obama signed the ACA legislation two days later on March 23.


https://www.forbes.com/sites/physiciansfoundation/2014/03/26/a-look-back-at-how-the-president-was-able-to-sign-obamacare-into-law-four-years-ago/2/#5dfee54a1020


Sucks to be Buck. :rofl2:

Republicans had ample opportunity to amend and debate the AHA bill.
So sure they could defeat it, they chose largely not to ...
Sucks to be GOP...
 
Sensible people don't attempt to run a nation on their feelings, attractive as that concept may be to feminized DEMOCRATS.

The problem with the noble-sounding inclusivity crusades of the left usually ends up being financial.

Obamacare is a failure for a variety of reasons, none of them attributable to bloodthirsty, selfish demons.

Sucks to be Buck. :rofl2:

The AHA is not a failure.
All attempts to repeal it, however, have been.
 
I'm not the one who started a thread stating that anyone who threadbans is a coward, am I?

lol

Nice try, pussy. I never said that, even though an illiterate coward like you might think so. I identified YOU as the major pussy. 31 bans? Who are you talking to, coward? Yourself?

"Members banned from this thread: Chuck and Nancy, Threedee, blackascoal, evince, christiefan915, ZappasGuitar, signalmankenneth, Taichiliberal, Covfefe, Rune, Althea, Buckly J. Ewer, Text Drivers are Killers, CFM, domer76, The Sage of Main Street, archives, Nomad, Micawber, TTQ64, Hesher, crowonapost, Amadeus, Tomas Fabregas, soiled knickers, Silver Buzzard, BillyB, floridafan, squared, Zippity Doo Da and Jenniel"

Lion-cowardly-lion-of-oz-17649413-703-576.jpg
 
I'm not the one who started a thread stating that anyone who threadbans is a coward, am I? Do you think your baby Zappacrite's self-righteousness is conducive to discussion? Is he paid to post here as the morals police?

I'm also not the one who stated that people who start threads to insult others are babies. Do you think your self-righteousness is conducive to discussion? Are you paid to post here as the morals police?
I don't care what it "suggests" to you. You're a proven hypocrite with partisan double standards, and that's been amply documented.

I have done what I have done, and I own up to it. You, not so much.

It's amusing that you are making such a big production out of this. For someone who's been here only two months, you sure came out strongly defending a poster you claim not to know. Why do you care what I say to someone I have a not-so-good history with?

You've criticized me for calling Yaya/Yurt a baby and said not one word to Yaya/Yurt about calling someone a drunkard. Where's the proof of this alcoholism? Why haven't you asked him to acknowledge his libel?

Your double standards are glaring. You and Yaya/Yurt are two of a kind, throwing out falsehoods about everyone but not owning up to your own shit-stirring.
 
Sensible people don't attempt to run a nation on their feelings, attractive as that concept may be to feminized DEMOCRATS.

<snip>

:rofl2:

*incredulous look* There isn't a politician in DC more driven by his feelings than trump. Thin-skinned, hot-headed and vindictive with a chip on his shoulder the size of a redwood.
 
It's amusing that you are making such a big production out of this. For someone who's been here only two months, you sure came out strongly defending a poster you claim not to know. Why do you care what I say to someone I have a not-so-good history with? You've criticized me for calling Yaya/Yurt a baby and said not one word to Yaya/Yurt about calling someone a drunkard. Where's the proof of this alcoholism? Why haven't you asked him to acknowledge his libel? Your double standards are glaring. You and Yaya/Yurt are two of a kind, throwing out falsehoods about everyone but not owning up to your own shit-stirring.

False premise, and more deflection. It's a pattern with you.

Yaya/Yurt didn't start a thread claiming that calling someone a drunkard is cowardly. That's why I don't "call him out".

Your baby boy Zappacrite started a thread claiming that threadbanning is cowardly, and he won't apply his own standard to Y O U even though you use thread bans.

Yaya/Yurt didn't make a statement claiming that calling someone a drunkard makes a poster a "baby". That's why I don't "call him out".

Y O U made a statement claiming that starting an insult thread makes a poster a "baby", and you won'y apply your own standard to Zappacrite even though he starts insult threads.

That's why you are both hypocrites with a proven track record of double standards.
 
21dcdf77f22dfdedc91b1a16c975f8d621065931b4009026e8024b797c584670.jpg


Nice try, pussy. I never said that

Are you illiterate? I didn't say that you did.

I specifically referred to Zappacrite as the author of that selectively moralistic thread.

Since you're obviously stupid, here's the conversation:


Do you think your self-righteousness is conducive to discussion? Are you paid to post here as the morals police?

I'm not the one who started a thread stating that anyone who threadbans is a coward, am I? Do you think your baby Zappacrite's self-righteousness is conducive to discussion? Is he paid to post here as the morals police?

I'm also not the one who stated that people who start threads to insult others are babies. Do you think your self-righteousness is conducive to discussion? Are you paid to post here as the morals police?

For reference, here's the thread I referred to:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...who-authors-quot-I-predict-liberals-will-quot


Try to keep up, will you? I imagine it's tough with your disability, but I'll see if I can get you a participation trophy for trying.

:rofl2:
 
False premise, and more deflection. It's a pattern with you.

Yaya/Yurt didn't start a thread claiming that calling someone a drunkard is cowardly. That's why I don't "call him out".

Your baby boy Zappacrite started a thread claiming that threadbanning is cowardly, and he won't apply his own standard to Y O U even though you use thread bans.

Yaya/Yurt didn't make a statement claiming that calling someone a drunkard makes a poster a "baby". That's why I don't "call him out".

Y O U made a statement claiming that starting an insult thread makes a poster a "baby", and you won'y apply your own standard to Zappacrite even though he starts insult threads.

That's why you are both hypocrites with a proven track record of double standards.

calvinharoldo.jpg


The lengths you'll go to are insane. Yaya/Yurt libeled a poster by calling him a drunk and all you can complain about is that I called him a baby.

Maybe you and Pimp went to the same law school. The one that teaches "if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bull shit."
 
No one really has...That is why McShame is voting no and the bill is DOA...
It is not presented in, "regular order" and the GOP is attempting to push it through strictly on a partisan basis, instead of on it's merits...
More Turtle-boy shenanigans...
More failure...
McCain doesn't GAF about "regular order" he's an almost-brain-dead #NeverTrump.

are you seriously saying:
GOP is attempting to push it through strictly on a partisan basis, instead of on it's merits...
is problematic?? But it was fine for the Dems to do that, huh? < rank partisanship
 
The lengths you'll go to are insane. Yaya/Yurt libeled a poster by calling him a drunk and all you can complain about is that I called him a baby. Maybe you and Pimp went to the same law school. The one that teaches "if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bull shit."

More deflection and dishonesty - at least you're consistent. Half of your rant makes no sense at all.

I caught you and your fellow double-standard bearer Zappaacrite, and you know it.

Now get busy and spit out some more nails. Our country's booming constriction industry needs materials. Make yourself useful for once.

:rofl2:
 
Hey there Sailor, good to see you. You still at sea or is that particular job finished?

Still at sea. Clearing harbors down the Caribbean for relief vessels to get in and running relief supplies(food, medical etc) ourselves in the interim. Irma jammed things up down here, Maria destroyed them.
 
More deflection and dishonesty - at least you're consistent. Half of your rant makes no sense at all.

I caught you and your fellow double-standard bearer Zappaacrite, and you know it.

Now get busy and spit out some more nails. Our country's booming constriction industry needs materials. Make yourself useful for once.

:rofl2:

The only thing you ever caught was a cold. But continue congratulating yourself, it's amusing.

patent07.jpg
 
JFC , pardon my swearing but that is an OPERATING budget (i'm sure).

Trump says "we spend billions and billions on NATO" -and you seriously think he's reduced that to covering operating expenses??
WHAT ABOUT THE COST OF equipment/personnel/wargames/fuel, etc etc..???

It's ridicuosly STUPID to say we spend 500 million on NATO!!.
++
when this first came up I was writing about he cost of Russiaphobia et all. Thing jumped in to"correct me"
it's an inanity at best.

Hit the books bitch.
Trump is a liar and you suck his jizz.
 
Back
Top