OldMercsRule
Verified User
What is 'principled' in a small bitter failed TARD infected President undercutting America's primary ME ally?
Dershowitz: Obama Will Go Down In History As One Of The Worst Foreign Policy Pres...
- Thread starter OldMercsRule
- Start date
What is 'principled' in a small bitter failed TARD infected President undercutting America's primary ME ally?
GazzaQueen
Verified User
Are you saying it was a wise move?
This thread is where you demonstrate your incredible stupidity. You're making the imbecile's assumption that the Democratic Party (not democrat party, idiot) of today is the same as the one with the same label of 100+ years ago or even 50 years ago. It's not. No more than today's Republican Party resembles Lincoln's. That you think so reveals your stupendous ignorance.
Where did you finish in the Special Olympics, dullard?
^Such a pitifully laughable ignoramus.
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
He was never in the Special Olympics.
Couldn't meet the minimum qualifications.
Because even they have certain standards to maintain.
Perhaps their waterboy or mascot. Maybe even THEIR token tard.
"What is 'principled' in a small bitter failed TARD infected President undercutting America's primary ME ally?" OR #121
"Undercutting"?
That's your subjective assessment.
You want another subjective assessment?
Here's one for you.
"I think it's time for him [Donald Trump ("R"-NY) Republican 2016 presidential candidate] to look like a serious candidate for president." Majority Leader McConnell (R-KY)
Trump didn't hue to McConnell's wishes.
Trump did what he thought was best. And Trump proved Trump was right, and McConnell (R-KY) was wrong.
Same w/ Obama. He did what's right, regardless of YOUR irrelevant subjective contempt.
"Are you saying it was a wise move?" GQ
If you read my posted comment you'll see that my comment was not about subjective wisdom assessment, but instead about the ethics of the criterion applied.
I understand Republicans don't understand ethical standards, and need to have them explained to them as an adult explains 2+2=4 to a young child.
But to intelligent, politics s a v v y observers and persons of principle; it's not really all that unfathomable.
It's ethics.
But don't worry.
It's not likely to be a prominent feature of the Trump administration.
"Undercutting"?
That's your subjective assessment.
You want another subjective assessment?
Here's one for you.
"I think it's time for him [Donald Trump ("R"-NY) Republican 2016 presidential candidate] to look like a serious candidate for president." Majority Leader McConnell (R-KY)
Trump didn't hue to McConnell's wishes.
Trump did what he thought was best. And Trump proved Trump was right, and McConnell (R-KY) was wrong.
Same w/ Obama. He did what's right, regardless of YOUR irrelevant subjective contempt.
"Are you saying it was a wise move?" GQ
If you read my posted comment you'll see that my comment was not about subjective wisdom assessment, but instead about the ethics of the criterion applied.
I understand Republicans don't understand ethical standards, and need to have them explained to them as an adult explains 2+2=4 to a young child.
But to intelligent, politics s a v v y observers and persons of principle; it's not really all that unfathomable.
It's ethics.
But don't worry.
It's not likely to be a prominent feature of the Trump administration.
GazzaQueen
Verified User
We can all agree Obama has been a principled disaster for the Democratic Party.
OldMercsRule
Verified User
The dim wit Democrat party, (of slavery, kkk, jim crow, treason, felony, sovereign bankruptcy and TARD), has always been on the wrong side of American history.
The state run hard Left media and many in Lefty academia have used propaganda to falsely label the Republican party with the upside down history of the dim wit Democrat party.
Historical facts are historical facts: dim wit Democrats cost this Republic over 650,000 lives due to the dim wit Democrat's support of slavery and after defeat pursued jim crow policies as a foundation of the dim wit Democrat party.
The dim wit Democrats on Joe McCarthy's famous list were in fact all Commies, they wanted treasonous John puke Kerry to be POTUS in 2004, and BJ Clinton committed two well documented felonies while serving as a dim wit Democrat POTUS.
Obamaprompter hasn't paid attention to our sovereign financial problems, and nearly every dim wit Democrat suffers from a massive case of TARD.
I rest my case.
Go ahead n' gnash yer teeth, historical facts are facts.
burp...
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
its the reason he was GIVEN the highest office in the land........
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
you gave him mulligans and he still didn't make par.......
GazzaQueen
Verified User
It took him that long to lose over 1,000 Democratic positions nationwide. And the Jewish support for the Democratic Party.
It's difficult to imagine someone as stupid as you. You've been corrected on this several times, but it just doesn't sink in. Do you take stupid pills in the morning or are you truly mentally retarded? I'm asking a serious question. Are you on some sort of mind-altering medication or do you hit the bottle so hard, you fail to understand simple concepts? Or did you drop out of school in 8th grade and ceased any further attempt to learn?
(laughing) You can't rest a case, shitweasel, if you never had one in the first place.
Illiterate fucking imbecile.
OldMercsRule
Verified User
What an upside down answer: dummer the Fightin' Irish swallower.
I rebutted you by giving direct historical point by point evidence, n' all yer doin' is bein' butt hwurted n' hurlin' insults.
No, idiot. You keep making the simpleton's assumption that the DEMOCRATIC Party hasn't changed in 100+ years. That merely reveals your massive historical ignorance. Those early Democrats were CONSERVATIVES. KKK, slavery, Jim Crow. All conservatives. Just like you.
OldMercsRule
Verified User
The propaganda from the state run media would have ya believe the back lash for the racist history of the dim wit Democrat party rests with the modern Republican party. That is just pure horse shit of the first order: dummer the swallower.
The policies of the Left under Obamaprompter set new records fer food stamp use, n' caused massive unemployment in the Black community and asset shrinkage.
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
No, but waiting this long to do it smacks of cowardice.
Do you really think it's wrong for a U.S. president to actually take a principled stand?
"No, but waiting this long to do it smacks of cowardice." G #139
Cowardice would explain it.
BUT !!
Cowardice is not the Ockham's Razor explanation.
U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama does not in most other ways seem to be a coward. Thus why would he be a coward on this one issue?
NOPE!
Not likely.
"No, but waiting this long to do it smacks of cowardice." G #139
Cowardice would explain it.
BUT !!
Cowardice is not the Ockham's Razor explanation.
U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama does not in most other ways seem to be a coward. Thus why would he be a coward on this one issue?
NOPE!
Not likely.